From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: abrodkin@synopsys.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ARC: make sure instruction_pointer() returns unsigned value" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 13:44:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143898025143144@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ARC: make sure instruction_pointer() returns unsigned value
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arc-make-sure-instruction_pointer-returns-unsigned-value.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From f51e2f1911122879eefefa4c592dea8bf794b39c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:25:17 +0300
Subject: ARC: make sure instruction_pointer() returns unsigned value
From: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
commit f51e2f1911122879eefefa4c592dea8bf794b39c upstream.
Currently instruction_pointer() returns pt_regs->ret and so return value
is of type "long", which implicitly stands for "signed long".
While that's perfectly fine when dealing with 32-bit values if return
value of instruction_pointer() gets assigned to 64-bit variable sign
extension may happen.
And at least in one real use-case it happens already.
In perf_prepare_sample() return value of perf_instruction_pointer()
(which is an alias to instruction_pointer() in case of ARC) is assigned
to (struct perf_sample_data)->ip (which type is "u64").
And what we see if instuction pointer points to user-space application
that in case of ARC lays below 0x8000_0000 "ip" gets set properly with
leading 32 zeros. But if instruction pointer points to kernel address
space that starts from 0x8000_0000 then "ip" is set with 32 leadig
"f"-s. I.e. id instruction_pointer() returns 0x8100_0000, "ip" will be
assigned with 0xffff_ffff__8100_0000. Which is obviously wrong.
In particular that issuse broke output of perf, because perf was unable
to associate addresses like 0xffff_ffff__8100_0000 with anything from
/proc/kallsyms.
That's what we used to see:
----------->8----------
6.27% ls [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff8046c5cc
2.96% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] memcpy
2.25% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] memset
1.66% ls [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff80666536
1.54% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] 0x000224d6
1.18% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] 0x00022472
----------->8----------
With that change perf output looks much better now:
----------->8----------
8.21% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] memset
3.52% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] memcpy
2.11% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] malloc
1.88% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] memset
1.64% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
1.41% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __d_lookup_rcu
----------->8----------
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: arc-linux-dev@synopsys.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arc/include/asm/ptrace.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct callee_regs {
long r25, r24, r23, r22, r21, r20, r19, r18, r17, r16, r15, r14, r13;
};
-#define instruction_pointer(regs) ((regs)->ret)
+#define instruction_pointer(regs) (unsigned long)((regs)->ret)
#define profile_pc(regs) instruction_pointer(regs)
/* return 1 if user mode or 0 if kernel mode */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from abrodkin@synopsys.com are
queue-4.1/arc-make-sure-instruction_pointer-returns-unsigned-value.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-08-07 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143898025143144@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=abrodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.