From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/bpf: clear correct BPF accumulator register" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 13:44:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143898025322206@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/bpf: clear correct BPF accumulator register
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-bpf-clear-correct-bpf-accumulator-register.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 30342fe65e511007672437741158d493472f427f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:26:15 +0200
Subject: s390/bpf: clear correct BPF accumulator register
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 30342fe65e511007672437741158d493472f427f upstream.
Currently we assumed the following BPF to eBPF register mapping:
- BPF_REG_A -> BPF_REG_7
- BPF_REG_X -> BPF_REG_8
Unfortunately this mapping is wrong. The correct mapping is:
- BPF_REG_A -> BPF_REG_0
- BPF_REG_X -> BPF_REG_7
So clear the correct registers and use the BPF_REG_A and BPF_REG_X
macros instead of BPF_REG_0/7.
Fixes: 054623105728 ("s390/bpf: Add s390x eBPF JIT compiler backend")
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -415,13 +415,13 @@ static void bpf_jit_prologue(struct bpf_
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0004, REG_SKB_DATA, REG_0,
BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data));
}
- /* BPF compatibility: clear A (%b7) and X (%b8) registers */
- if (REG_SEEN(BPF_REG_7))
- /* lghi %b7,0 */
- EMIT4_IMM(0xa7090000, BPF_REG_7, 0);
- if (REG_SEEN(BPF_REG_8))
- /* lghi %b8,0 */
- EMIT4_IMM(0xa7090000, BPF_REG_8, 0);
+ /* BPF compatibility: clear A (%b0) and X (%b7) registers */
+ if (REG_SEEN(BPF_REG_A))
+ /* lghi %ba,0 */
+ EMIT4_IMM(0xa7090000, BPF_REG_A, 0);
+ if (REG_SEEN(BPF_REG_X))
+ /* lghi %bx,0 */
+ EMIT4_IMM(0xa7090000, BPF_REG_X, 0);
}
/*
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.1/s390-bpf-clear-correct-bpf-accumulator-register.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-08-07 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143898025322206@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.