All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: snitzer@redhat.com, axboe@fb.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "bio integrity: do not assume bio_integrity_pool exists if bioset exists" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 14:14:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <143898207679252@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    bio integrity: do not assume bio_integrity_pool exists if bioset exists

to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bio-integrity-do-not-assume-bio_integrity_pool-exists-if-bioset-exists.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From bb8bd38b9a1685334b73e8c62e128cbedb875867 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:57:40 -0400
Subject: bio integrity: do not assume bio_integrity_pool exists if bioset exists

From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>

commit bb8bd38b9a1685334b73e8c62e128cbedb875867 upstream.

bio_integrity_alloc() and bio_integrity_free() assume that if a bio was
allocated from a bioset that that bioset also had its bio_integrity_pool
allocated using bioset_integrity_create().  This is a very bad
assumption given that bioset_create() and bioset_integrity_create() are
completely disjoint.  Not all callers of bioset_create() have been
trained to also call bioset_integrity_create() -- and they may not care
to be.

Fix this by falling back to kmalloc'ing 'struct bio_integrity_payload'
rather than force all bioset consumers to (wastefully) preallocate a
bio_integrity_pool that they very likely won't actually need (given the
niche nature of the current block integrity support).

Otherwise, a NULL pointer "Kernel BUG" with a trace like the following
will be observed (as seen on s390x using zfcp storage) because dm-io
doesn't use bioset_integrity_create() when creating its bioset:

    [  791.643338] Call Trace:
    [  791.643339] ([<00000003df98b848>] 0x3df98b848)
    [  791.643341]  [<00000000002c5de8>] bio_integrity_alloc+0x48/0xf8
    [  791.643348]  [<00000000002c6486>] bio_integrity_prep+0xae/0x2f0
    [  791.643349]  [<0000000000371e38>] blk_queue_bio+0x1c8/0x3d8
    [  791.643355]  [<000000000036f8d0>] generic_make_request+0xc0/0x100
    [  791.643357]  [<000000000036f9b2>] submit_bio+0xa2/0x198
    [  791.643406]  [<000003ff801f9774>] dispatch_io+0x15c/0x3b0 [dm_mod]
    [  791.643419]  [<000003ff801f9b3e>] dm_io+0x176/0x2f0 [dm_mod]
    [  791.643423]  [<000003ff8074b28a>] do_reads+0x13a/0x1a8 [dm_mirror]
    [  791.643425]  [<000003ff8074b43a>] do_mirror+0x142/0x298 [dm_mirror]
    [  791.643428]  [<0000000000154fca>] process_one_work+0x18a/0x3f8
    [  791.643432]  [<000000000015598a>] worker_thread+0x132/0x3b0
    [  791.643435]  [<000000000015d49a>] kthread+0xd2/0xd8
    [  791.643438]  [<00000000005bc0ca>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc
    [  791.643446]  [<00000000005bc0c4>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 block/bio-integrity.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/block/bio-integrity.c
+++ b/block/bio-integrity.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct bio_integrity_payload *bio_integr
 	unsigned long idx = BIO_POOL_NONE;
 	unsigned inline_vecs;
 
-	if (!bs) {
+	if (!bs || !bs->bio_integrity_pool) {
 		bip = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bio_integrity_payload) +
 			      sizeof(struct bio_vec) * nr_vecs, gfp_mask);
 		inline_vecs = nr_vecs;
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void bio_integrity_free(struct bio *bio)
 		kfree(page_address(bip->bip_vec->bv_page) +
 		      bip->bip_vec->bv_offset);
 
-	if (bs) {
+	if (bs && bs->bio_integrity_pool) {
 		if (bip->bip_slab != BIO_POOL_NONE)
 			bvec_free(bs->bvec_integrity_pool, bip->bip_vec,
 				  bip->bip_slab);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from snitzer@redhat.com are

queue-4.1/bio-integrity-do-not-assume-bio_integrity_pool-exists-if-bioset-exists.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-08-07 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=143898207679252@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.