From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
richard@nod.at, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ubifs: make ubifs_[get|set]xattr atomic
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:05:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1439193902.26877.96.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438927640-14931-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Right now, AFAICS, UBIFS uses the "host" inode mutex to serialize xattr
operations. May be the terminology is not the best, but "host" is the
non-xattr inode (say, a file inode) which "carries" the extended
attributes. So one "host" may have many xattrs.
Now, obviously, locking the entire "host" to change one xattr is very
coarse, because operations on other xattrs get blocked by operations on
other, unrelated xattrs.
So the host inode has fields like "xattr_size" - this needs to be
protected with the host mutex, but operations on individual xattrs may
be protected by xattr mutexes. However, this would be a more complex
locking scheme.
So my point is - use the "host->ui_mutex", not the xattr's mutex,
because this is how it is implemented now.
Re-working and improving locking could be a separate piece of job.
On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 14:07 +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> This commit make the ubifs_[get|set]xattr protected by ui_mutex.
>
> Originally, there is a possibility that ubifs_getxattr to get
> a wrong value.
>
> P1 P2
> ---------- ----------
> ubifs_getxattr ubifs_setxattr
> - kfree()
> - memcpy()
> - kmemdup()
>
...
>
> + mutex_lock(&ui->ui_mutex);
Or to put it differently, you need to use 'host->ui_mutex', not 'ui
->ui_mutex', because 'ui' is the xattr inode here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-10 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-30 5:37 [PATCH] ubifs: make ubifs_[get|set]xattr atomic Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-30 8:05 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-07-31 0:04 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-07-31 1:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-03 20:27 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-07 5:40 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-07 6:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-10 8:05 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2015-08-11 3:32 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-11 12:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2015-08-12 2:37 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-11 12:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2015-08-12 2:37 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-08 20:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1439193902.26877.96.camel@gmail.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.