From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, gw@idfusion.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ima: add support for new "euid" policy condition" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:03:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143925141610590@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ima: add support for new "euid" policy condition
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ima-add-support-for-new-euid-policy-condition.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 139069eff7388407f19794384c42a534d618ccd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 07:48:36 -0500
Subject: ima: add support for new "euid" policy condition
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 139069eff7388407f19794384c42a534d618ccd7 upstream.
The new "euid" policy condition measures files with the specified
effective uid (euid). In addition, for CAP_SETUID files it measures
files with the specified uid or suid.
Changelog:
- fixed checkpatch.pl warnings
- fixed avc denied {setuid} messages - based on Roberto's feedback
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. Greg Wettstein <gw@idfusion.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 3 ++-
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Description:
action: measure | dont_measure | appraise | dont_appraise | audit
condition:= base | lsm [option]
base: [[func=] [mask=] [fsmagic=] [fsuuid=] [uid=]
- [fowner]]
+ [euid=] [fowner=]]
lsm: [[subj_user=] [subj_role=] [subj_type=]
[obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]]
option: [[appraise_type=]] [permit_directio]
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Description:
fsmagic:= hex value
fsuuid:= file system UUID (e.g 8bcbe394-4f13-4144-be8e-5aa9ea2ce2f6)
uid:= decimal value
+ euid:= decimal value
fowner:=decimal value
lsm: are LSM specific
option: appraise_type:= [imasig]
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#define IMA_UID 0x0008
#define IMA_FOWNER 0x0010
#define IMA_FSUUID 0x0020
+#define IMA_EUID 0x0080
#define UNKNOWN 0
#define MEASURE 0x0001 /* same as IMA_MEASURE */
@@ -179,6 +180,16 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_r
return false;
if ((rule->flags & IMA_UID) && !uid_eq(rule->uid, cred->uid))
return false;
+ if (rule->flags & IMA_EUID) {
+ if (has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SETUID)) {
+ if (!uid_eq(rule->uid, cred->euid)
+ && !uid_eq(rule->uid, cred->suid)
+ && !uid_eq(rule->uid, cred->uid))
+ return false;
+ } else if (!uid_eq(rule->uid, cred->euid))
+ return false;
+ }
+
if ((rule->flags & IMA_FOWNER) && !uid_eq(rule->fowner, inode->i_uid))
return false;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
@@ -350,7 +361,8 @@ enum {
Opt_audit,
Opt_obj_user, Opt_obj_role, Opt_obj_type,
Opt_subj_user, Opt_subj_role, Opt_subj_type,
- Opt_func, Opt_mask, Opt_fsmagic, Opt_uid, Opt_fowner,
+ Opt_func, Opt_mask, Opt_fsmagic,
+ Opt_uid, Opt_euid, Opt_fowner,
Opt_appraise_type, Opt_fsuuid, Opt_permit_directio
};
@@ -371,6 +383,7 @@ static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
{Opt_fsmagic, "fsmagic=%s"},
{Opt_fsuuid, "fsuuid=%s"},
{Opt_uid, "uid=%s"},
+ {Opt_euid, "euid=%s"},
{Opt_fowner, "fowner=%s"},
{Opt_appraise_type, "appraise_type=%s"},
{Opt_permit_directio, "permit_directio"},
@@ -542,6 +555,9 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, st
break;
case Opt_uid:
ima_log_string(ab, "uid", args[0].from);
+ case Opt_euid:
+ if (token == Opt_euid)
+ ima_log_string(ab, "euid", args[0].from);
if (uid_valid(entry->uid)) {
result = -EINVAL;
@@ -550,11 +566,14 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, st
result = strict_strtoul(args[0].from, 10, &lnum);
if (!result) {
- entry->uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), (uid_t)lnum);
- if (!uid_valid(entry->uid) || (((uid_t)lnum) != lnum))
+ entry->uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(),
+ (uid_t) lnum);
+ if (!uid_valid(entry->uid) ||
+ (uid_t)lnum != lnum)
result = -EINVAL;
else
- entry->flags |= IMA_UID;
+ entry->flags |= (token == Opt_uid)
+ ? IMA_UID : IMA_EUID;
}
break;
case Opt_fowner:
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-3.14/ima-extend-mask-policy-matching-support.patch
queue-3.14/ima-add-support-for-new-euid-policy-condition.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-08-11 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143925141610590@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gw@idfusion.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.