From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitignore: Don't ignore *.rej Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:32:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1439461929.23981.71.camel@citrix.com> References: <1439370457-20675-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <20150812143125.GG17002@l.oracle.com> <21963.25751.496570.780266@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21963.25751.496570.780266@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Daniel Kiper , jbeulich@suse.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 16:21 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] gitignore: Don't > ignore *.rej"): > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:07:37AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > These indicate a patch application went wrong, I want to see them in > > > "git status". This appears to have been imported from .hgignore where > > > it has been since 2005. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell > > > Cc: Daniel Kiper > > > > Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > Acked-by: Ian Jackson > > (As an aside, I would normally apply a `usual' kind of trivial > .gitignore update without waiting for any kind of ack. But this one > seems not entirely trivial.) Right, I thought it might even be controversial, but it seems not. I've applied.