From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54FE767D6 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t7IGZ4eg019313; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:36:27 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CXZP5h87z5Gq; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:36:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t7IGaDlf019335 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:36:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1439915773.12105.128.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Christopher Larson Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:36:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <365E1805BC95084CBE82381A0B869994E73E4FE9@EU-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com> <969F26A8BAB325438E7EB80D3C3134FB16CFA7F5@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: iw in place of wireless-tools X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:36:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 09:00 -0700, Christopher Larson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Christopher Larson > wrote: > Bringing this back up again, as I think we really need to at > the *very* least pull in iw from meta-oe into oe-core, and > adjust packagegroup-base (worst case, with a VIRTUAL-RUNTIME), > and better yet also drop wireless-tools / move it to > meta-networking. > > Worst case, we could keep both in VIRTUAL-RUNTIME for compatibility, > as a temporary measure, but I think we need to get iw into oe-core and > into the base images for sure. Agreed, patches would be welcome! Cheers, Richard