From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 08:28:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1440228529.23097.38.camel@citrix.com> References: <55CDDA1A020000780009AF5F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <1439716489.3480.31.camel@citrix.com> <55D1F2A5020000780009B60F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZT3EW-0000nW-LF for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 07:28:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: <55D1F2A5020000780009B60F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 06:41 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > On 16.08.15 at 11:14, wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this > > > flight. > > > > Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose your motive is > > that > > you want to get 4.4.x+1 out the door and I don't think we should > > block > > that over this issue. > > Right. Flight 60696 shows exactly the same single failure. > > Could one of you two force-push then please? Sorry for the delay. I went to look into this and found it had passed in the meantime. There's some new stuff in staging-4.4 now, which looks to be the subject of flight 60802, which is due to finish this afternoon. Ian.