From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: Re: h8300 build failures in linux-next (in rcu code, gcc 5.x related, not limited to h8300)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:16:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440526586.2120.0.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150825180252.GA13318@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 20:02 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > On 08/26, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > > gcc bug #67055.
> > > Already fixed in trunk.
> >
> > Yes, thanks a lot.
> >
> > Paul, it seems that gcc actually dislikes your ec90a194a "rcu:
> > Create a synchronize_rcu_mult()" commit ;) rcu/sync.c was just
> > lucky enough to trigger the problem.
> >
> > I'll try to make the fix today...
>
> Mark, Guenter, any chance you can check if the patch below helps?
> It does on x86.
Works for c6x.
>
> Oleg.
>
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -230,12 +230,11 @@ void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n,
> call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
> struct rcu_synchronize *rs_array);
>
> #define _wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ...) \
> -do { \
> - call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ }; \
> - const int __n = ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array); \
> - struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[__n]; \
> - \
> - __wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, __n, __crcu_array, __rs_array); \
> +do {
> \
> + call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ };
> \
> + struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array)];
> \
> + __wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array),
> \
> + __crcu_array, __rs_array);
> \
> } while (0)
>
> #define wait_rcu_gp(...) _wait_rcu_gp(false, __VA_ARGS__)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-24 18:34 h8300 build failures ijn linux-next Guenter Roeck
2015-08-25 5:56 ` Yoshinori Sato
2015-08-25 14:27 ` Mark Salter
2015-08-25 15:03 ` h8300 build failures in linux-next (in rcu code, gcc 5.x related, not limited to h8300) Guenter Roeck
2015-08-25 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 16:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 16:51 ` Yoshinori Sato
2015-08-25 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 18:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 18:16 ` Mark Salter [this message]
2015-08-25 18:45 ` [PATCH] rcu: change _wait_rcu_gp() to work around gcc 67055 bug Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 19:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-25 19:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440526586.2120.0.camel@redhat.com \
--to=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.