From: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap-common: SYS_BOOT fallback logic correction
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:59:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440629971.19618.27.camel@collins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150826132326.GT25532@bill-the-cat>
Le mercredi 26 ao?t 2015 ? 09:23 -0400, Tom Rini a ?crit :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:51:07PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > On all OMAP platforms, USB peripheral loading is done via bulk USB and I
> > suspect it is the same on am33xx platforms.
>
> Actually no! :(
>
> On OMAP3/4/5 (so dra7xx/am57xx) it's the same bulk USB. On
> AM33xx/AM43xx it's (in ROM) USB RNDIS. That's why on am33xx/am43xx we
> continue on with USB RNDIS (which is what SPL_USBETH_SUPPORT implements,
> not the other USB "ethernet" class).
Interesting. So with this in mind, would it be acceptable to assume that
BOOT_DEVICE_USB and BOOT_DEVICE_USBETH are always two distinct boot
devices and thus not have to care about whether they're equal or not and
just assume they're not, like any other BOOT_DEVICE?
This would greatly simplify the logic and make everything more readable.
I can submit a new patch set in that direction tomorrow.
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Replicant developer
Replicant is a fully free Android distribution running on several
devices, a free software mobile operating system putting the emphasis on
freedom and privacy/security.
Website: http://www.replicant.us/
Blog: http://blog.replicant.us/
Wiki/tracker/forums: http://redmine.replicant.us/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150827/1d95d8cd/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-26 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-25 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap-common: SYS_BOOT fallback logic correction Paul Kocialkowski
2015-08-25 16:06 ` Tom Rini
2015-08-26 6:24 ` Hannes Schmelzer
2015-08-26 10:51 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-08-26 13:23 ` Tom Rini
2015-08-26 22:59 ` Paul Kocialkowski [this message]
2015-08-26 23:06 ` Tom Rini
2015-08-27 4:11 ` Hannes Schmelzer
2015-08-26 11:00 ` Paul Kocialkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440629971.19618.27.camel@collins \
--to=contact@paulk.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.