Re: [Question] Is little endian supported on all the platforms?

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 21:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:

> Yes. Maybe something like this?

I would have done it the other way around with endian at the top
and only the supported platforms displayed based on the endian...

But I don't care *that* much either way

>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype >b/arch/powerpc/pl
atforms/Kconfig.cputype
> index c140e94..c359f72 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
> @@ -415,9 +415,13 @@ config VDSO32
>           big endian. That is because the only little endian
> configuration we
>           support is ppc64le which is 64-bit only.
>  
> +config CHOOSE_ENDIAN
> +       bool
> +
>  choice
>         prompt "Endianness selection"
>         default CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> +       depends on CHOOSE_ENDIAN
>         help
>           This option selects whether a big endian or little endian
> kernel will
>           be built.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Kconfig
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Kconfig
> index 604190c..32d5661 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Kconfig
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ config PPC_POWERNV
>         select CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND
>         select CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
>         select PPC_DOORBELL
> +       select CHOOSE_ENDIAN
>         default y
>  
>  config OPAL_PRD
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> index 54c87d5..182f485 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ config PPC_PSERIES
>         select HOTPLUG_CPU if SMP
>         select ARCH_RANDOM
>         select PPC_DOORBELL
> +       select CHOOSE_ENDIAN
>         default y
>  
>  config PPC_SPLPAR
> 
> 
> 
> > > But the specific problem you are having looks like a differnet
> > > issue
> > > with the PS3 boot wrapper.
> > > 
> > 
> > But could the reason of this be that the building process of the
> > PS3
> > boot wrapper assumes the kernel is BE?
> 
> It looks more like we're getting confused between 32-bit and 64-bit,
> from your
> log:
> 
>     ld: powerpc:common64 architecture of input file
> `arch/powerpc/boot/ps3-head.o' is incompatible with powerpc:common
> output
> 
> Which says it has a .o which is 64-bit but it's trying to produce 32
> -bit output.
> 
> That's probably related to the PPC64_BOOT_WRAPPER stuff.
> 
> cheers
>