From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: PCI Pass-through in Xen ARM: Draft 4 Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:47:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1441205231.26292.227.camel@citrix.com> References: <55CC668F.80104@caviumnetworks.com> <55CCD3F1020000780009AC34@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <1439485284.23981.129.camel@citrix.com> <55CDD04F020000780009AEDC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55CDD04F020000780009AEDC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: "Prasun.kapoor@cavium.com" , stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, Manish Jaggi , Vijaya Kumar , JulienGrall , Xen Devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 03:26 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > On 13.08.15 at 19:01, wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 09:29 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > A bunch of your questions seem to be about things which have been > > discussed > > at length in previous postings, it's probably worth reviewing some of > > those > > discussions. > > With the huge amount of mail to be read after returning from vacation > I had hoped to avoid that, I think I'd forgotten at the time that you had recently been away, sorry. > assuming that results of such discussion > would (should) manifest themselves in the new draft Yes, that would also be ideal. Ian.