All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jstancek@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, fin@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	leosilva@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "crypto: nx - respect sg limit bounds when building sg lists for SHA" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:23:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441952581218223@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    crypto: nx - respect sg limit bounds when building sg lists for SHA

to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     crypto-nx-respect-sg-limit-bounds-when-building-sg-lists-for-sha.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From d3392f41f6d3cd0a034bd0aca47fabea2b47218e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 08:47:28 +0200
Subject: crypto: nx - respect sg limit bounds when building sg lists for SHA

From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>

commit d3392f41f6d3cd0a034bd0aca47fabea2b47218e upstream.

Commit 000851119e80 changed sha256/512 update functions to
pass more data to nx_build_sg_list(), which ends with
sg list overflows and usually with update functions failing
for data larger than max_sg_len * NX_PAGE_SIZE.

This happens because:
- both "total" and "to_process" are updated, which leads to
  "to_process" getting overflowed for some data lengths
  For example:
    In first iteration "total" is 50, and let's assume "to_process"
    is 30 due to sg limits. At the end of first iteration "total" is
    set to 20. At start of 2nd iteration "to_process" overflows on:
      to_process = total - to_process;
- "in_sg" is not reset to nx_ctx->in_sg after each iteration
- nx_build_sg_list() is hitting overflow because the amount of data
  passed to it would require more than sgmax elements
- as consequence of previous item, data stored in overflowed sg list
  may no longer be aligned to SHA*_BLOCK_SIZE

This patch changes sha256/512 update functions so that "to_process"
respects sg limits and never tries to pass more data to
nx_build_sg_list() to avoid overflows. "to_process" is calculated
as minimum of "total" and sg limits at start of every iteration.

Fixes: 000851119e80 ("crypto: nx - Fix SHA concurrence issue and sg
		      limit bounds")
Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Cc: Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa <leosilva@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Henrique Cerri <mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Fionnuala Gunter <fin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha512.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c
@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash
 	struct sha256_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
 	struct nx_crypto_ctx *nx_ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(&desc->tfm->base);
 	struct nx_csbcpb *csbcpb = (struct nx_csbcpb *)nx_ctx->csbcpb;
-	struct nx_sg *in_sg;
 	struct nx_sg *out_sg;
 	u64 to_process = 0, leftover, total;
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
@@ -97,7 +96,6 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash
 	NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_INTERMEDIATE;
 	NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_CONTINUATION;
 
-	in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
 	max_sg_len = min_t(u64, nx_ctx->ap->sglen,
 			nx_driver.of.max_sg_len/sizeof(struct nx_sg));
 	max_sg_len = min_t(u64, max_sg_len,
@@ -114,17 +112,12 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash
 	}
 
 	do {
-		/*
-		 * to_process: the SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE data chunk to process in
-		 * this update. This value is also restricted by the sg list
-		 * limits.
-		 */
-		to_process = total - to_process;
-		to_process = to_process & ~(SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+		int used_sgs = 0;
+		struct nx_sg *in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
 
 		if (buf_len) {
 			data_len = buf_len;
-			in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(nx_ctx->in_sg,
+			in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg,
 						 (u8 *) sctx->buf,
 						 &data_len,
 						 max_sg_len);
@@ -133,15 +126,27 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash
 				rc = -EINVAL;
 				goto out;
 			}
+			used_sgs = in_sg - nx_ctx->in_sg;
 		}
 
+		/* to_process: SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE aligned chunk to be
+		 * processed in this iteration. This value is restricted
+		 * by sg list limits and number of sgs we already used
+		 * for leftover data. (see above)
+		 * In ideal case, we could allow NX_PAGE_SIZE * max_sg_len,
+		 * but because data may not be aligned, we need to account
+		 * for that too. */
+		to_process = min_t(u64, total,
+			(max_sg_len - 1 - used_sgs) * NX_PAGE_SIZE);
+		to_process = to_process & ~(SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+
 		data_len = to_process - buf_len;
 		in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg, (u8 *) data,
 					 &data_len, max_sg_len);
 
 		nx_ctx->op.inlen = (nx_ctx->in_sg - in_sg) * sizeof(struct nx_sg);
 
-		to_process = (data_len + buf_len);
+		to_process = data_len + buf_len;
 		leftover = total - to_process;
 
 		/*
--- a/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha512.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha512.c
@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash
 	struct sha512_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
 	struct nx_crypto_ctx *nx_ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(&desc->tfm->base);
 	struct nx_csbcpb *csbcpb = (struct nx_csbcpb *)nx_ctx->csbcpb;
-	struct nx_sg *in_sg;
 	struct nx_sg *out_sg;
 	u64 to_process, leftover = 0, total;
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
@@ -97,7 +96,6 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash
 	NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_INTERMEDIATE;
 	NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_CONTINUATION;
 
-	in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
 	max_sg_len = min_t(u64, nx_ctx->ap->sglen,
 			nx_driver.of.max_sg_len/sizeof(struct nx_sg));
 	max_sg_len = min_t(u64, max_sg_len,
@@ -114,18 +112,12 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash
 	}
 
 	do {
-		/*
-		 * to_process: the SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE data chunk to process in
-		 * this update. This value is also restricted by the sg list
-		 * limits.
-		 */
-		to_process = total - leftover;
-		to_process = to_process & ~(SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
-		leftover = total - to_process;
+		int used_sgs = 0;
+		struct nx_sg *in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
 
 		if (buf_len) {
 			data_len = buf_len;
-			in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(nx_ctx->in_sg,
+			in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg,
 						 (u8 *) sctx->buf,
 						 &data_len, max_sg_len);
 
@@ -133,8 +125,20 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash
 				rc = -EINVAL;
 				goto out;
 			}
+			used_sgs = in_sg - nx_ctx->in_sg;
 		}
 
+		/* to_process: SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE aligned chunk to be
+		 * processed in this iteration. This value is restricted
+		 * by sg list limits and number of sgs we already used
+		 * for leftover data. (see above)
+		 * In ideal case, we could allow NX_PAGE_SIZE * max_sg_len,
+		 * but because data may not be aligned, we need to account
+		 * for that too. */
+		to_process = min_t(u64, total,
+			(max_sg_len - 1 - used_sgs) * NX_PAGE_SIZE);
+		to_process = to_process & ~(SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+
 		data_len = to_process - buf_len;
 		in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg, (u8 *) data,
 					 &data_len, max_sg_len);
@@ -146,7 +150,7 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		to_process = (data_len + buf_len);
+		to_process = data_len + buf_len;
 		leftover = total - to_process;
 
 		/*


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jstancek@redhat.com are

queue-4.1/crypto-nx-respect-sg-limit-bounds-when-building-sg-lists-for-sha.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-09-11  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1441952581218223@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=leosilva@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.