From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:16:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1442330218.18856.1.camel@citrix.com> References: <1442310104-23932-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <22008.12365.255490.89666@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zbryx-0003jU-UN for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:17:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: <22008.12365.255490.89666@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson , Wei Liu Cc: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 15:50 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH 0/4] libxl: use LOG() macro where appropriate"): > > There are mixed usage of different logging macros. Ideally we only use > > one > > style to avoid confusion. > > All four > > Acked-by: Ian Jackson In terms of applying it seems like the sort of thing which would cause a lot of pain for backports to 4.6. Shall we hold off or do we think the inflow of backports has slowed sufficiently now? Ian.