From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jgross@suse.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, luto@kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/ldt: Correct FPU emulation access to LDT" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:43:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <144234982310390@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/ldt: Correct FPU emulation access to LDT
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-ldt-correct-fpu-emulation-access-to-ldt.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 4809146b86c3d41ce588fdb767d021e2a80600dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:54:34 +0200
Subject: x86/ldt: Correct FPU emulation access to LDT
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
commit 4809146b86c3d41ce588fdb767d021e2a80600dd upstream.
Commit 37868fe113ff ("x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt synchronous")
introduced a new struct ldt_struct anchored at mm->context.ldt.
Adapt the x86 fpu emulation code to use that new structure.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: billm@melbpc.org.au
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438883674-1240-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_entry.c | 3 +--
arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
arch/x86/math-emu/get_address.c | 3 +--
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_entry.c
+++ b/arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_entry.c
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/traps.h>
-#include <asm/desc.h>
#include <asm/user.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>
@@ -185,7 +184,7 @@ void math_emulate(struct math_emu_info *
math_abort(FPU_info, SIGILL);
}
- code_descriptor = LDT_DESCRIPTOR(FPU_CS);
+ code_descriptor = FPU_get_ldt_descriptor(FPU_CS);
if (SEG_D_SIZE(code_descriptor)) {
/* The above test may be wrong, the book is not clear */
/* Segmented 32 bit protected mode */
--- a/arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h
+++ b/arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h
@@ -16,9 +16,24 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
-/* s is always from a cpu register, and the cpu does bounds checking
- * during register load --> no further bounds checks needed */
-#define LDT_DESCRIPTOR(s) (((struct desc_struct *)current->mm->context.ldt)[(s) >> 3])
+#include <asm/desc.h>
+#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
+
+static inline struct desc_struct FPU_get_ldt_descriptor(unsigned seg)
+{
+ static struct desc_struct zero_desc;
+ struct desc_struct ret = zero_desc;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODIFY_LDT_SYSCALL
+ seg >>= 3;
+ mutex_lock(¤t->mm->context.lock);
+ if (current->mm->context.ldt && seg < current->mm->context.ldt->size)
+ ret = current->mm->context.ldt->entries[seg];
+ mutex_unlock(¤t->mm->context.lock);
+#endif
+ return ret;
+}
+
#define SEG_D_SIZE(x) ((x).b & (3 << 21))
#define SEG_G_BIT(x) ((x).b & (1 << 23))
#define SEG_GRANULARITY(x) (((x).b & (1 << 23)) ? 4096 : 1)
--- a/arch/x86/math-emu/get_address.c
+++ b/arch/x86/math-emu/get_address.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
#include <linux/stddef.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
-#include <asm/desc.h>
#include "fpu_system.h"
#include "exception.h"
@@ -158,7 +157,7 @@ static long pm_address(u_char FPU_modrm,
addr->selector = PM_REG_(segment);
}
- descriptor = LDT_DESCRIPTOR(PM_REG_(segment));
+ descriptor = FPU_get_ldt_descriptor(segment);
base_address = SEG_BASE_ADDR(descriptor);
address = base_address + offset;
limit = base_address
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jgross@suse.com are
queue-4.1/x86-ldt-correct-ldt-access-in-single-stepping-logic.patch
queue-4.1/x86-ldt-correct-fpu-emulation-access-to-ldt.patch
queue-4.1/x86-ldt-further-fix-fpu-emulation.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-09-15 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=144234982310390@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.