From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [osstest test] 60719: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:28:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442392134.18856.25.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F3A269.8040304@suse.com>
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 21:56 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 10:35 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder if this has anything to do with migration V2? I noticed a
> > > migration
> > > regression a few days back, but later realized that the sender was
> > > 4.5 and
> > > receiver was 4.6. I planned to see if migration worked through
> > > libvirt between
> > > two 4.6 hosts, but before doing so I had to re-purpose the machines
> > > for another
> > > task. I think libvirt needs some work to accommodate migration V2...
> > So after shaving a bunch of yakks wrt getting my test boxes setup I've
> > finally tracked this one down...
>
> Thanks for investigating this issue! It bubbled to the top of my queue,
> so I'm
> glad I read this mail before duplicating the effort.
>
> >
> > libvirt is passing libxl a restore (and perhaps save) file descriptor
> > which
> > is set O_NONBLOCK, which libxl/c doesn't expect and therefore doesn't
> > handle the resulting EAGAIN.
> >
> > Ian and I think it would be more convenient for most callers if libxl
> > took
> > care of this by making the fd blocking again and returning it to the
> > original state when it was done.
> >
> > I'll cook up a patch.
>
> I also noticed your patch has been ACK'ed and applied. Thanks again!
No problem.
FYI the osstest fixup to /etc/hosts hit osstest production yesterday
andflight 62004 is the first to pickup both that and the libxl fix, it's
doing the build phase about now, so I'd expect actual the results tomorrow.
Hopefully we'll get a pass from the test-*-*-libvirt-pair job!
Ian.
> Regards,
> Jim
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-16 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <osstest-60719-mainreport@xen.org>
2015-08-21 8:05 ` [osstest test] 60719: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED Ian Campbell
2015-08-21 14:02 ` Wei Liu
2015-08-22 7:25 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-27 3:33 ` Jim Fehlig
2015-09-01 12:47 ` Ian Jackson
2015-09-01 13:14 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-03 6:38 ` Jim Fehlig
2015-09-03 10:26 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-03 10:49 ` Ian Jackson
2015-09-03 10:57 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-03 16:04 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-03 11:37 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-03 16:35 ` Jim Fehlig
2015-09-03 16:49 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-10 16:40 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-12 3:56 ` Jim Fehlig
2015-09-16 8:28 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-09-04 2:47 ` Jim Fehlig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442392134.18856.25.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jfehlig@suse.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.