From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for-4.6] libxl: handle read-only drives with qemu-xen Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:47:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1442566078.18856.249.camel@citrix.com> References: <22009.29866.235485.172892@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1442488400.18856.182.camel@citrix.com> <22010.65343.246452.525100@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcrKv-0001U2-A5 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:48:05 +0000 In-Reply-To: <22010.65343.246452.525100@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Stefano Stabellini , wei.liu2@citrix.com, M A Young List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 18:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH v2 for-4.6] libxl: handle read-only > drives with qemu-xen"): > > So shall we go ahead with this for 4.6 or is there more > > testing/discussion/whatever needed? > > I think we can commit it to 4.6. I would like to issue the actual > advisory though. > > I see no-one commented. > > It is definitely wrong at least in that it asserts that the same patch > works for 4.5. Would anyone care to supply a patch for 4.5 and > earlier or shall I prepare one ? I think it should be just s/ERROR_FOO/NULL/g? > > Ian.