From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:54491 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752618AbbIRNLZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:11:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1442581882.2168.13.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150918_151127_226278_79D49942) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] add script to enable audio backport From: Johannes Berg To: Pierre-Louis Bossart , backports@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:11:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55FC0C72.20806@linux.intel.com> References: <1442526437-22392-1-git-send-email-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <1442526437-22392-3-git-send-email-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> (sfid-20150917_234743_628456_B160EAFA) <1442560633.2168.6.camel@sipsolutions.net> <55FC0C72.20806@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 08:06 -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > "You can submit this part upstream btw - it'll just be disabled in > the > default copy-list... unless you also submit that upstream" > > If you are ok to take the patches and have the upstream copy-list > include the sound files then yes the script is not necessary. I just > wanted to have a first pass that isn't intrusive or breaks all the > backports, but simple enough for others to try and test. Ah. Well I think that we'd probably wait until it compiles against all kernels, but after that having them included in the upstream copy-list isn't an issue at all. And until then perhaps you'd just provide it as a separate tree or patch somewhere, I don't think we should add it to backports like that. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in