From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [Patch v2 02/16] common/board_f.c: modify the macro to use get_clocks() more common
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:32:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442935954.19102.238.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56016A61.3060700@freescale.com>
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 07:49 -0700, York Sun wrote:
> On 09/21/2015 07:59 PM, Gong Qianyu-B52263 wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sun York-R58495
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:27 AM
> > > To: Gong Qianyu-B52263; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> > > Cc: Hu Mingkai-B21284; Sun York-R58495; Hou Zhiqiang-B48286; Xie
> > > Shaohui-
> > > B21989; Song Wenbin-B53747; Wood Scott-B07421
> > > Subject: Re: [Patch v2 02/16] common/board_f.c: modify the macro to use
> > > get_clocks() more common
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 09/17/2015 12:02 AM, Gong Qianyu wrote:
> > > > get_clocks() should not be limited by ESDHC.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong@freescale.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > common/board_f.c | 2 +-
> > > > include/configs/BSC9132QDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/MPC8308RDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/MPC837XERDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/MPC8536DS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/P1010RDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/P1022DS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/P2041RDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T102xQDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T102xRDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T1040QDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T104xRDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T208xQDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T208xRDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T4240QDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T4240RDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/UCP1020.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/colibri_vf.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/controlcenterd.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/corenet_ds.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/hrcon.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/ima3-mx53.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/ls1021aqds.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/ls1021atwr.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/ls2085aqds.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/ls2085ardb.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/m53evk.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/mx25pdk.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/mx35pdk.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/mx51_efikamx.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/mx51evk.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/mx53ard.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/mx53evk.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/mx53loco.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/mx53smd.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/mx6_common.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/p1_p2_rdb_pc.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/p1_twr.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/usbarmory.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/vf610twr.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/vision2.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/woodburn_common.h | 1 +
> > > > 44 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > Can you take a closer look at the powerpc boards? I think most of them
> > > already calling get_clocks under this
> > >
> > > defined(CONFIG_PPC) && !defined(CONFIG_8xx_CPUCLK_DEFAULT)
> > >
> > > York
> >
> > I'm also confused about this. They have called get_clocks() twice on PPC
> > before even though they use CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC.
> > I just made a replacement for it to keep the original meaning.
> > So where should get_clocks() be called correctly on PPC?
> >
>
> It doesn't hurt to run twice for ppc. The second call is needed for
> Freescale
> i.mx SoCs since it doesn't active the first one.
>
> Please test ppc targets without the change in header file.
Is there a reason why i.mx needs to call it later? Is there a reason why PPC
needs to call it sooner?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-17 7:02 [U-Boot] [Patch v2 02/16] common/board_f.c: modify the macro to use get_clocks() more common Gong Qianyu
2015-09-21 17:26 ` York Sun
2015-09-22 2:59 ` Gong Q.Y.
2015-09-22 14:49 ` York Sun
2015-09-22 15:32 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-09-22 15:42 ` York Sun
2015-09-21 17:33 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442935954.19102.238.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.