From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: preparing for 4.5.2 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:17:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1443183472.25250.128.camel@citrix.com> References: <5605492802000078000A58EF@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfRwq-0005nR-RB for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:17:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5605492802000078000A58EF@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson , Julien Grall Cc: xen-devel , Jan Beulich , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian, On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 05:16 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > All, > > with 4.5.2 being due in about 4 weeks please indicate to the respective > maintainers backports you see missing from but consider relevant for > the 4.5 stable branch. Please note that according to the outcome of a > recent discussion we're intending to do this release without any RC. Running through my list of ARM backports I found these two tools commits which according to my notes are the only thing blocking the use of 64K pages in Linux on Xen 4.5. 506f87b tools/xenconsoled: Use XC_PAGE_SIZE rather than getpagesize() 7c0a96a tools/xenstored: Use XC_PAGE_SIZE rather than getpagesize() Julien, is this still correct and is it still worth having for 4.5?