From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [[BACKPORT 4.5]] xen/arm: vgic-v2: Map the GIC virtual CPU interface with the correct size Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:39:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1443188345.25250.148.camel@citrix.com> References: <1443186606-6289-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfTDT-0006sc-8E for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:39:11 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1443186606-6289-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: jbeulich@suse.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 14:10 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: FYI your Subject resulted in git am making a commit titled: ] xen/arm: vgic-v2: Map the GIC virtual CPU interface with the correct size You probably just forgot that --subject-prefix has the []'s added automatically, but if it was deliberate please don't ;-) I've fixed this. > The original patch doesn't apply cleanly in Xen 4.5 because the code has > been moved from gic-v2.c to vgic-v2.c in Xen 4.6. Thanks, applied. > Ian, I'm not sure if I should have kept your Acked-by here. They are normally retained in the backports, whether they are done by cherry-pick or not. I think it was fine for you to do so.