All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rc6_residency: Measure the sleep duration
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:07:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443445677.32471.0.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443200489-30524-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 20:01 +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The code is confused about the units of CODE_TIME. The comment
> says 50 microsseconds, but the actual code makes it 50
> milliseconds. Avoid the whole mess by measuring the sleep
> duration ourselves. Since the time measurement is taken around
> the whole operation it obviously includes a bit of extra, but
> at least it's much less than the fixed 50 ms.
> 
> For instance on one VLV board I now get something like this:
> - Residency in rc6 or deeper state: 3002 ms (ratio to expected duration: 0.98)
> + Residency in rc6 or deeper state: 3001 ms (sleep duration 3003 ms) (ratio to expected duration: 1.00)
> so the reported ratio is now much closer to reality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

> ---
>  tests/Makefile.am        |  1 +
>  tests/pm_rc6_residency.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am
> index 5aa480b..c4f1f01 100644
> --- a/tests/Makefile.am
> +++ b/tests/Makefile.am
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ gem_userptr_blits_LDADD = $(LDADD) -lpthread
>  
>  gem_wait_LDADD = $(LDADD) -lrt
>  kms_flip_LDADD = $(LDADD) -lrt -lpthread
> +pm_rc6_residency_LDADD = $(LDADD) -lrt
>  
>  prime_nv_test_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS) $(DRM_NOUVEAU_CFLAGS)
>  prime_nv_test_LDADD = $(LDADD) $(DRM_NOUVEAU_LIBS)
> diff --git a/tests/pm_rc6_residency.c b/tests/pm_rc6_residency.c
> index a1e281c..2772969 100644
> --- a/tests/pm_rc6_residency.c
> +++ b/tests/pm_rc6_residency.c
> @@ -32,10 +32,10 @@
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
> +#include <time.h>
>  
> 
> -#define SLEEP_DURATION 3000 // in milliseconds
> -#define CODE_TIME 50 // in microseconfs
> +#define SLEEP_DURATION 3 /* in seconds */
>  
>  #define RC6_ENABLED	1
>  #define RC6P_ENABLED	2
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct residencies {
>  	int media_rc6;
>  	int rc6p;
>  	int rc6pp;
> +	int duration;
>  };
>  
>  static unsigned int readit(const char *path)
> @@ -96,14 +97,15 @@ static int read_rc6_residency(const char *name_of_rc6_residency)
>  }
>  
>  static void residency_accuracy(unsigned int diff,
> +			       unsigned int duration,
>  			       const char *name_of_rc6_residency)
>  {
>  	double ratio;
>  
> -	ratio = (double)diff / (SLEEP_DURATION + CODE_TIME);
> +	ratio = (double)diff / duration;
>  
> -	igt_info("Residency in %s or deeper state: %u ms (ratio to expected duration: %.02f)\n",
> -		 name_of_rc6_residency, diff, ratio);
> +	igt_info("Residency in %s or deeper state: %u ms (sleep duration %u ms) (ratio to expected duration: %.02f)\n",
> +		 name_of_rc6_residency, diff, duration, ratio);
>  	igt_assert_f(ratio > 0.9 && ratio <= 1,
>  		     "Sysfs RC6 residency counter is inaccurate.\n");
>  }
> @@ -125,12 +127,22 @@ static void read_residencies(int devid, unsigned int rc6_mask,
>  		res->rc6pp = read_rc6_residency("rc6pp");
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long gettime_ms(void)
> +{
> +	struct timespec ts;
> +
> +	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
> +
> +	return ts.tv_sec * 1000 + ts.tv_nsec / 1000000;
> +}
> +
>  static void measure_residencies(int devid, unsigned int rc6_mask,
>  				struct residencies *res)
>  {
>  	struct residencies start = { };
>  	struct residencies end = { };
>  	int retry;
> +	unsigned long t;
>  
>  	if (!rc6_mask)
>  		return;
> @@ -147,9 +159,11 @@ static void measure_residencies(int devid, unsigned int rc6_mask,
>  	 * different platforms and so fixing it up would be non-trivial.
>  	 */
>  	for (retry = 0; retry < 2; retry++) {
> +		t = gettime_ms();
>  		read_residencies(devid, rc6_mask, &start);
> -		sleep(SLEEP_DURATION / 1000);
> +		sleep(SLEEP_DURATION);
>  		read_residencies(devid, rc6_mask, &end);
> +		t = gettime_ms() - t;
>  
>  		if (end.rc6 >= start.rc6 && end.media_rc6 >= start.media_rc6 &&
>  		    end.rc6p >= start.rc6p && end.rc6pp >= start.rc6pp)
> @@ -161,6 +175,7 @@ static void measure_residencies(int devid, unsigned int rc6_mask,
>  	res->rc6p = end.rc6p - start.rc6p;
>  	res->rc6pp = end.rc6pp - start.rc6pp;
>  	res->media_rc6 = end.media_rc6 - start.media_rc6;
> +	res->duration = t;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * For the purposes of this test case we want a given residency value
> @@ -196,22 +211,22 @@ igt_main
>  	igt_subtest("rc6-accuracy") {
>  		igt_skip_on(!(rc6_mask & RC6_ENABLED));
>  
> -		residency_accuracy(res.rc6, "rc6");
> +		residency_accuracy(res.rc6, res.duration, "rc6");
>  	}
>  	igt_subtest("media-rc6-accuracy") {
>  		igt_skip_on(!((rc6_mask & RC6_ENABLED) &&
>  			      (IS_VALLEYVIEW(devid) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(devid))));
>  
> -		residency_accuracy(res.media_rc6, "media_rc6");
> +		residency_accuracy(res.media_rc6, res.duration, "media_rc6");
>  	}
>  	igt_subtest("rc6p-accuracy") {
>  		igt_skip_on(!(rc6_mask & RC6P_ENABLED));
>  
> -		residency_accuracy(res.rc6p, "rc6p");
> +		residency_accuracy(res.rc6p, res.duration, "rc6p");
>  	}
>  	igt_subtest("rc6pp-accuracy") {
>  		igt_skip_on(!(rc6_mask & RC6PP_ENABLED));
>  
> -		residency_accuracy(res.rc6pp, "rc6pp");
> +		residency_accuracy(res.rc6pp, res.duration, "rc6pp");
>  	}
>  }


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      reply	other threads:[~2015-09-28 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-25 17:01 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rc6_residency: Measure the sleep duration ville.syrjala
2015-09-28 13:07 ` Imre Deak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1443445677.32471.0.camel@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.