From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28FF73CBD for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t8TCqFYv002686; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:52:15 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fyJYr9XaDVrH; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:52:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t8TCq3UV002683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:52:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1443531123.5162.27.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Robert Yang Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:52:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5603B2E7.6060606@windriver.com> References: <5603B2E7.6060606@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] siggen.py: fix clean_basepath() X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:52:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 16:23 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > Hi RP, > > I'm not sure what patch causes this problem, this patch can fix it, > but I'm not sure whether it is a correct fix or not. The code there is quite deliberately adding this in. The issue is around shared workdir and shared stamps that we had for gcc in particular. Without this, we used to get stamp mismatches reported for gcc unpack/fetch/patch tasks. That said, I think the shared stamps code was a bad idea, we've stopped using it for gcc now (gcc-source is there instead) and we should probably remove all remnants of stamp-base from bitbake as it turned out to be a bad idea. I'd probably leave fixing this until we do that. Cheers, Richard