From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: luto@kernel.org, bp@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/nmi/64: Reorder nested NMI checks" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:19:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443536349247189@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/nmi/64: Reorder nested NMI checks
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-nmi-64-reorder-nested-nmi-checks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From a27507ca2d796cfa8d907de31ad730359c8a6d06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:29:37 -0700
Subject: x86/nmi/64: Reorder nested NMI checks
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
commit a27507ca2d796cfa8d907de31ad730359c8a6d06 upstream.
Check the repeat_nmi .. end_repeat_nmi special case first. The
next patch will rework the RSP check and, as a side effect, the
RSP check will no longer detect repeat_nmi .. end_repeat_nmi, so
we'll need this ordering of the checks.
Note: this is more subtle than it appears. The check for
repeat_nmi .. end_repeat_nmi jumps straight out of the NMI code
instead of adjusting the "iret" frame to force a repeat. This
is necessary, because the code between repeat_nmi and
end_repeat_nmi sets "NMI executing" and then writes to the
"iret" frame itself. If a nested NMI comes in and modifies the
"iret" frame while repeat_nmi is also modifying it, we'll end up
with garbage. The old code got this right, as does the new
code, but the new code is a bit more explicit.
If we were to move the check right after the "NMI executing"
check, then we'd get it wrong and have random crashes.
( Because the "NMI executing" check would jump to the code that would
modify the "iret" frame without checking if the interrupted NMI was
currently modifying it. )
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -1842,7 +1842,23 @@ ENTRY(nmi)
/*
* Determine whether we're a nested NMI.
*
- * First check "NMI executing". If it's set, then we're nested.
+ * If we interrupted kernel code between repeat_nmi and
+ * end_repeat_nmi, then we are a nested NMI. We must not
+ * modify the "iret" frame because it's being written by
+ * the outer NMI. That's okay; the outer NMI handler is
+ * about to about to call do_nmi anyway, so we can just
+ * resume the outer NMI.
+ */
+ movq $repeat_nmi, %rdx
+ cmpq 8(%rsp), %rdx
+ ja 1f
+ movq $end_repeat_nmi, %rdx
+ cmpq 8(%rsp), %rdx
+ ja nested_nmi_out
+1:
+
+ /*
+ * Now check "NMI executing". If it's set, then we're nested.
* This will not detect if we interrupted an outer NMI just
* before IRET.
*/
@@ -1860,21 +1876,6 @@ ENTRY(nmi)
nested_nmi:
/*
- * If we interrupted an NMI that is between repeat_nmi and
- * end_repeat_nmi, then we must not modify the "iret" frame
- * because it's being written by the outer NMI. That's okay;
- * the outer NMI handler is about to call do_nmi anyway,
- * so we can just resume the outer NMI.
- */
- movq $repeat_nmi, %rdx
- cmpq 8(%rsp), %rdx
- ja 1f
- movq $end_repeat_nmi, %rdx
- cmpq 8(%rsp), %rdx
- ja nested_nmi_out
-
-1:
- /*
* Modify the "iret" frame to point to repeat_nmi, forcing another
* iteration of NMI handling.
*/
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from luto@kernel.org are
queue-3.14/x86-nmi-64-use-df-to-avoid-userspace-rsp-confusing-nested-nmi-detection.patch
queue-3.14/x86-nmi-enable-nested-do_nmi-handling-for-64-bit-kernels.patch
queue-3.14/x86-nmi-64-remove-asm-code-that-saves-cr2.patch
queue-3.14/x86-nmi-64-switch-stacks-on-userspace-nmi-entry.patch
queue-3.14/x86-nmi-64-improve-nested-nmi-comments.patch
queue-3.14/x86-nmi-64-reorder-nested-nmi-checks.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1443536349247189@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.