From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E9A76710 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t8TEnYUK010826; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:51:02 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id oppbuPYJoGvQ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:51:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t8TEolY6010878 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:50:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1443538247.5162.43.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:50:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1440666021-11411-1-git-send-email-andrew.shadura@collabora.co.uk> <1442225233-18899-1-git-send-email-andrew.shadura@collabora.co.uk> <560A8690.1050809@collabora.co.uk> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Andrew Shadura , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dbus: merge .bb and .inc X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:51:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:41 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 29 September 2015 at 13:39, Andrew Shadura > wrote: > There hasn't been anything on this for two weeks already, has > anyone > considered merging these patches? > > Sorry but they didn't quite make the M3 deadline (well, the patches > did, but reviewing didn't as we were heads down trying to fix the > build). If you can rebase and resend when master re-opens (when 2.0 > is released) that would be much appreciated. Just to add that what would help is a little bit more explanation about what happened in the patches. It looks like dbus-glib isn't needed for example but the commit message doesn't mention why? Cheers, Richard