From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 1/2] TestSupport.pm: allow creating
 vNUMA enabled HVM guest configs
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:32:06 +0200
Message-ID: <1443789126.14525.68.camel@citrix.com>
References: <20151001230750.15271.26071.stgit@Solace.station>
	<20151001231731.15271.87986.stgit@Solace.station>
	<20151002113242.GA30122@zion.uk.xensource.com>
	<1443787335.14525.62.camel@citrix.com>
	<20151002122144.GE30122@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0987678377363416536=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=71076c5f6=dario.faggioli@citrix.com>)
	id 1ZhzVV-0006N9-3k
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:32:13 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20151002122144.GE30122@zion.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@ctirix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============0987678377363416536==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AeSbvI3lEgKsB1+74NJV"

--=-AeSbvI3lEgKsB1+74NJV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 13:21 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:

> > However, I think your point is valid... I think I can, in case
> > vnuma_nodes is provided, overrun $ram_mb with something more likely
> > to
> > fit on one physical node?
> >=20
>=20
> Missed this one, sorry.
>=20
> I'm not sure what exact thing you proposed. But I think it would be
> valuable to have the guest ram larger than 4GB. That would certainly
> catch many bugs that involves memory layout changes, especially for
> feature like vnuma.
>=20
Well, once I'm parsing (see the my other reply), I guess I can easily
check whether that it is possible and, if yes, make it happen.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-AeSbvI3lEgKsB1+74NJV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEABECAAYFAlYOeUYACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSOMgCfeqKnv6FAaEMQP9YbN887QJvg
HlEAoJnlbiA/RuGiECZf691hp7TaLYxV
=zKaJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-AeSbvI3lEgKsB1+74NJV--


--===============0987678377363416536==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============0987678377363416536==--