Re: [PATCH 3/7] xen: sched: better handle (not) inserting idle vCPUs in runqueues

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1111 bytes --]

On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 16:27 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/10/15 13:52, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > [...]
> > The check for whether we'd be inserting an idle vCPU
> > in a queue, now, happens, once and for all schedulers,
> > in generic code, at vCPU initialization time, while
> > we can just avoid trying (and always failing!) doing
> > so when doing cpupools manipulations.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> 
> Although it might be easier to evaluate the previous patch if this
> one
> were moved behind it in the series:
> 
Indeed. I only did it like this because, in case we want to backport
patch 1 and 2, we would not need to backport this one (which is more an
improvement than a bugfix) too.

> Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
> 
Thanks. :-)

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel