From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: RFC: Survey on release cycle Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:33:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1444901621.1607.45.camel@citrix.com> References: <20151012173222.GE2421@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmeuv-0004Z7-Ol for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:33:45 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20151012173222.GE2421@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:32 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > # 6 months release cycle + current stable release scheme # 6 months release cycle + extended security support +1 to either of these, but +2 for picking one of them. (not really sure how to express that in a vote, sorry). > # 6 months release cycle + LTS scheme +1 > # 9 months release cycle + current stable release scheme -1 Ian.