All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: labbott@fedoraproject.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, oneukum@suse.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de
Subject: patch "xhci: Add spurious wakeup quirk for LynxPoint-LP controllers" added to usb-linus
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 00:04:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <144506548213743@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xhci: Add spurious wakeup quirk for LynxPoint-LP controllers

to my usb git tree which can be found at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-linus branch.

The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)

The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.

If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.


>From fd7cd061adcf5f7503515ba52b6a724642a839c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:30:13 +0300
Subject: xhci: Add spurious wakeup quirk for LynxPoint-LP controllers

We received several reports of systems rebooting and powering on
after an attempted shutdown. Testing showed that setting
XHCI_SPURIOUS_WAKEUP quirk in addition to the XHCI_SPURIOUS_REBOOT
quirk allowed the system to shutdown as expected for LynxPoint-LP
xHCI controllers. Set the quirk back.

Note that the quirk was originally introduced for LynxPoint and
LynxPoint-LP just for this same reason. See:

commit 638298dc66ea ("xhci: Fix spurious wakeups after S5 on Haswell")

It was later limited to only concern HP machines as it caused
regression on some machines, see both bug and commit:

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66171
commit 6962d914f317 ("xhci: Limit the spurious wakeup fix only to HP machines")

Later it was discovered that the powering on after shutdown
was limited to LynxPoint-LP (Haswell-ULT) and that some non-LP HP
machine suffered from spontaneous resume from S3 (which should
not be related to the SPURIOUS_WAKEUP quirk at all). An attempt
to fix this then removed the SPURIOUS_WAKEUP flag usage completely.

commit b45abacde3d5 ("xhci: no switching back on non-ULT Haswell")

Current understanding is that LynxPoint-LP (Haswell ULT) machines
need the SPURIOUS_WAKEUP quirk, otherwise they will restart, and
plain Lynxpoint (Haswell) machines may _not_ have the quirk
set otherwise they again will restart.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
[Added more history to commit message -Mathias]
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
index c79d33676672..c47d3e480586 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL &&
 		pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_LYNXPOINT_LP_XHCI) {
 		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_SPURIOUS_REBOOT;
+		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_SPURIOUS_WAKEUP;
 	}
 	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL &&
 		(pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SUNRISEPOINT_LP_XHCI ||
-- 
2.6.1



                 reply	other threads:[~2015-10-17  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=144506548213743@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=labbott@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.