From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, broonie@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "regulator: core: Correct return value check in regulator_resolve_supply" has been added to the 4.2-stable tree
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:17:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <144511306525070@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
regulator: core: Correct return value check in regulator_resolve_supply
to the 4.2-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
regulator-core-correct-return-value-check-in-regulator_resolve_supply.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.2 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 23c3f310e897837aeb8ffe8700b803cb58e7b35d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:50:20 +0100
Subject: regulator: core: Correct return value check in regulator_resolve_supply
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
commit 23c3f310e897837aeb8ffe8700b803cb58e7b35d upstream.
The ret pointer passed to regulator_dev_lookup is only filled with a
valid error code if regulator_dev_lookup returned NULL. Currently
regulator_resolve_supply checks this ret value before it checks if a
regulator was returned, this can result in valid regulator lookups being
ignored.
Fixes: 6261b06de565 ("regulator: Defer lookup of supply to regulator_get")
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1376,15 +1376,15 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(stru
return 0;
r = regulator_dev_lookup(dev, rdev->supply_name, &ret);
- if (ret == -ENODEV) {
- /*
- * No supply was specified for this regulator and
- * there will never be one.
- */
- return 0;
- }
-
if (!r) {
+ if (ret == -ENODEV) {
+ /*
+ * No supply was specified for this regulator and
+ * there will never be one.
+ */
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (have_full_constraints()) {
r = dummy_regulator_rdev;
} else {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com are
queue-4.2/regulator-core-correct-return-value-check-in-regulator_resolve_supply.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-10-17 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=144511306525070@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.