From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Barros Pena, Belen" <belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
Cc: bitbake-devel <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cooker: Ensure BB_CONSOLE remains correct over server resets
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:39:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445254777.17974.95.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D24A84FE.68625%belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 10:32 +0000, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
>
> On 16/10/2015 16:59, "bitbake-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org on
> behalf of Richard Purdie" <bitbake-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org on
> behalf of richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 16:57 +0100, Smith, Elliot wrote:
> >> Thanks for these, Richard.
> >>
> >> On 11 October 2015 at 10:22, Richard Purdie
> >> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> The console log data is written to is created at console
> >> initialisation
> >> time and does not change over reset events. This ensures the
> >> BB_CONSOLELOG value is correct over such resets by preserving
> >> it.
> >>
> >> I've put your three patches on top of master and ran a few builds.
When you say "ran a few builds", was this with toaster? I'd like to
double check we are seeing the right behaviour but it depends how you
actually ran the builds as to whether this was the right result.
> The
> >> result is that all of the logs for those builds are going into a
> >> single timestamped file. Before, they went to separate files. Is this
> >> intentional, or was the old behaviour incorrect? (Ideally, toaster
> >> needs a separate log file for each build.)
> >>
> >It should generate one log file for each "session". A session would be
> >one logfile for all bitbake memory resident transactions and a log file
> >for each commandline transaction.
> >
> >It is a "console log", not an individual build log.
>
> Mmmm, for Toaster we need an individual build log, not a console log :/
Since toaster records all the log information, is it not able to compute
an individual build log from that data?
The reason I'm reluctant to just add some kind of "build log"
functionality to bitbake is that at the commandline level, I think it
would mislead people. In theory, a "build" would be the output between
BuildStarted and BuildCompleted, the question is then what happens to
the output before and after these events.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-11 9:22 [PATCH] cooker: Ensure BB_CONSOLE remains correct over server resets Richard Purdie
2015-10-16 15:57 ` Smith, Elliot
2015-10-16 15:59 ` Richard Purdie
2015-10-19 10:32 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2015-10-19 11:39 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2015-10-19 12:27 ` Smith, Elliot
2015-10-24 11:26 ` Richard Purdie
2015-10-26 11:12 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2015-10-27 11:21 ` Smith, Elliot
2015-10-27 12:32 ` Smith, Elliot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445254777.17974.95.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=belen.barros.pena@intel.com \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.