From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: restart list search after unlock in scsi_remove_target Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 09:01:31 -0700 Message-ID: <1445270491.2188.23.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20151019143546.GA7486@lst.de> <56250DF7.6050803@sandisk.com> <20151019155658.GA11453@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:47768 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750814AbbJSQBd (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:01:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20151019155658.GA11453@lst.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Bart Van Assche , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jthumshirn@suse.de, Dan Williams On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 17:56 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:36:23AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > Thanks for looking into this. However, I think we need a motivation in the > > patch description why this patch does not reintroduce the soft lockup > > documented in patch "scsi_remove_target: fix softlockup regression on hot > > remove" (commit bc3f02a795d3). > > Interesting. I tried to find the original report and what state > changes would cause an endless loop here. The original report is this one: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1348679 James > Dan, do you remember any > details about this bug report? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >