From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] powerpc32: optimise a few instructions in csum_partial()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:30:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445571040.701.149.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a4e1624642137dc2b16bbb68ea87b1a479dfa34.1442876807.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 16:34 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> r5 does contain the value to be updated, so lets use r5 all way long
> for that. It makes the code more readable.
>
> To avoid confusion, it is better to use adde instead of addc
>
> The first addition is useless. Its only purpose is to clear carry.
> As r4 is a signed int that is always positive, this can be done by
> using srawi instead of srwi
>
> Let's also remove the comment about bdnz having no overhead as it
> is not correct on all powerpc, at least on MPC8xx
>
> In the last part, in our situation, the remaining quantity of bytes
> to be proceeded is between 0 and 3. Therefore, we can base that part
> on the value of bit 31 and bit 30 of r4 instead of anding r4 with 3
> then proceding on comparisons and substractions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S | 37 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Do you have benchmarks for these optimizations?
-Scott
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S
> index 3472372..9c12602 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S
> @@ -27,35 +27,32 @@
> * csum_partial(buff, len, sum)
> */
> _GLOBAL(csum_partial)
> - addic r0,r5,0
> subi r3,r3,4
> - srwi. r6,r4,2
> + srawi. r6,r4,2 /* Divide len by 4 and also clear carry */
> beq 3f /* if we're doing < 4 bytes */
> - andi. r5,r3,2 /* Align buffer to longword boundary */
> + andi. r0,r3,2 /* Align buffer to longword boundary */
> beq+ 1f
> - lhz r5,4(r3) /* do 2 bytes to get aligned */
> - addi r3,r3,2
> + lhz r0,4(r3) /* do 2 bytes to get aligned */
> subi r4,r4,2
> - addc r0,r0,r5
> + addi r3,r3,2
> srwi. r6,r4,2 /* # words to do */
> + adde r5,r5,r0
> beq 3f
> 1: mtctr r6
> -2: lwzu r5,4(r3) /* the bdnz has zero overhead, so it should */
> - adde r0,r0,r5 /* be unnecessary to unroll this loop */
> +2: lwzu r0,4(r3)
> + adde r5,r5,r0
> bdnz 2b
> - andi. r4,r4,3
> -3: cmpwi 0,r4,2
> - blt+ 4f
> - lhz r5,4(r3)
> +3: andi. r0,r4,2
> + beq+ 4f
> + lhz r0,4(r3)
> addi r3,r3,2
> - subi r4,r4,2
> - adde r0,r0,r5
> -4: cmpwi 0,r4,1
> - bne+ 5f
> - lbz r5,4(r3)
> - slwi r5,r5,8 /* Upper byte of word */
> - adde r0,r0,r5
> -5: addze r3,r0 /* add in final carry */
> + adde r5,r5,r0
> +4: andi. r0,r4,1
> + beq+ 5f
> + lbz r0,4(r3)
> + slwi r0,r0,8 /* Upper byte of word */
> + adde r5,r5,r0
> +5: addze r3,r5 /* add in final carry */
> blr
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 14:34 [PATCH 0/9] powerpc32: set of optimisation of network checksum functions Christophe Leroy
2015-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] powerpc: unexport csum_tcpudp_magic Christophe Leroy
2015-09-22 14:34 ` Christophe Leroy
2015-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] powerpc: mark xer clobbered in csum_add() Christophe Leroy
2015-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] powerpc32: checksum_wrappers_64 becomes checksum_wrappers Christophe Leroy
2015-10-23 3:26 ` Scott Wood
2015-10-28 11:11 ` Anton Blanchard
2015-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] powerpc: inline ip_fast_csum() Christophe Leroy
2015-09-23 5:43 ` Denis Kirjanov
2016-02-29 7:25 ` Christophe Leroy
2016-03-05 3:50 ` [4/9] " Scott Wood
2016-03-05 3:50 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] powerpc32: rewrite csum_partial_copy_generic() based on copy_tofrom_user() Christophe Leroy
2015-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] powerpc32: optimise a few instructions in csum_partial() Christophe Leroy
2015-10-23 3:30 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2016-02-29 12:53 ` Christophe Leroy
2015-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] powerpc32: optimise csum_partial() loop Christophe Leroy
2015-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] powerpc: simplify csum_add(a, b) in case a or b is constant 0 Christophe Leroy
2015-10-23 3:33 ` Scott Wood
2016-02-29 7:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2015-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: optimise csum_partial() call when len is constant Christophe Leroy
2015-10-23 3:32 ` Scott Wood
2016-03-05 5:29 ` [9/9] " Scott Wood
2015-09-23 22:38 ` [PATCH 0/9] powerpc32: set of optimisation of network checksum functions David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445571040.701.149.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.