From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:46:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1445589989.5117.19.camel@citrix.com> References: <1444640103-4685-1-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> <562A085A02000078000ADDC3@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3583778424059437355==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Wu, Feng" , Jan Beulich Cc: "george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com" , Lars Kurth , "Li, Susie" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============3583778424059437355== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Hej00F2CMQ9Lw08Q7vUv" --=-Hej00F2CMQ9Lw08Q7vUv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 08:35 +0000, Wu, Feng wrote: >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com] > > > > > On 23.10.15 at 04:12, wrote: > > > Kindly ping ... > >=20 > > I can understand that you want to get this to make progress, but as > > said a number of times before (in variouw contexts) - as long as > > Intel > > contributors in general and Intel maintainers in particular won't > > become more active in reviewing patches, I don't think you can > > expect the few of us to carry the load of reviewing all these large > > series that have been submitted by Intel during the last couple of > > months. >=20 > Yes, this is a large series, but most of them have been reviewed, > right? > And thanks to your review efforts on them. Now I think the remaining > review effort will need be put to patch > "[PATCH v8 15/17] vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling", > which was understand discussion among you, George, Dario, and me > during the last couple of weeks, since the memory is still fresh, why > not continue to review it?=20 > I'll have a look ASAP, probably today. However, "why not continue to review it", I think Jan put down quite some sensible arguments for it. Also, as he said, there is no chance that we _don't_ continue to review the series, it's just a matter of priorities, which are influenced by a lot of factors. > And I think maybe it is more efficient to do > it now. >=20 Hey, everyone of us has his own workflow, and his own definitions of what's "more efficient". :-) Given the timing, I think it's after all fine that you "Kindly ping" this series... Just don't get too far with that! :-D :-D Anyway, and jokes apart, as said, I was already planning to have a look at this soon. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-Hej00F2CMQ9Lw08Q7vUv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlYp8+UACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRgnACgiPsXKNsk2kxPt2fE43gHTS63 XOQAn22+W4f5vitBvy5yYeKLac/LPcSD =Ug3b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Hej00F2CMQ9Lw08Q7vUv-- --===============3583778424059437355== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============3583778424059437355==--