From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] xen/arm: vgic-v2: Report the correct GICC size to the guest Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:28:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1445606932.2374.163.camel@citrix.com> References: <1444328634-32110-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <1444328634-32110-2-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpcOv-0002yc-Nr for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:28:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1444328634-32110-2-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 19:23 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > The GICv2 DT node is usually used by the guest to know the address/size > of the regions (GICD, GICC...) to map into their virtual memory. > > While the GICv2 spec requires the size of the GICC to be 8KB, we > correctly do an 8KB stage-2 mapping but errornously report 256 in the > device tree (based on GUEST_GICC_SIZE). "erroneously" > > I bet we didn't see any issue so far because all the registers except > GICC_DIR lives in the first 256 bytes of the GICC region and all the guest "guests" > I have seen so far are driving the GIC with GICC_CTLR.EIOmode = > 0. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked-by: Ian Campbell (typo's fixable on commit). > --- > This patch is a good candidate to backport for Xen 4.6 - 4.4. > Without it a guest relying on the DT can't use GICC_DIR. Noted, but just to check: This patch (and none of the other fixes in this series) are all which are required for a guest to be able to use GICC_DIR, right?