Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/arm: Add support of PSCI v1.0 for the host

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>]

On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:39 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/10/15 11:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 18:17 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 22/10/15 16:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Subject: support PSCI v1.0 for the host.
> > > > 
> > > > > From Xen point of view, PSCI v0.2 and PSCI v1.0 are very similar.
> > > > > All
> > > >        Xen's
> > > > 
> > > > > the PSCI calls used within Xen (PSCI_VERSION, CPU_ON, SYSTEM_OFF
> > > > > and
> > > > > SYSTEM_RESET) behaves exactly the same.
> > > > 
> > > >                 behave
> > > > 
> > > > > Furthermore, based on the spec (5.3.1 DEN0022C), any 1.y version
> > > > > must
> > > > > be
> > > > > compatible with 1.x when y > x for any functions existing in 1.x.
> > > > > 
> > > > > So check the presence of the new compatible string [1] and allow
> > > > > Xen
> > > > > to
> > > > > boot on any platform using PSCI 1.x.
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1] 
> > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-Octobe
> > > > > r/37
> > > > > 4547.html
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > > 
> > > Shall I resend a new version with those typos fixed? Or do you plan
> > > to
> > > do it when you'll commit the patch?
> > 
> > Looks like those are the only changes required, so assuming you are are
> > happy with them I'll just do them on commit.
> 
> I'm fine with that.

Applied, thanks.