From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: clm@fb.com, fdmanana@suse.com, mfasheh@suse.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix use after free iterating extrefs" failed to apply to 3.10-stable tree
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:15:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445609756180187@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From dc6c5fb3b514221f2e9d21ee626a9d95d3418dff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:06:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix use after free iterating extrefs
The code for btrfs inode-resolve has never worked properly for
files with enough hard links to trigger extrefs. It was trying to
get the leaf out of a path after freeing the path:
btrfs_release_path(path);
leaf = path->nodes[0];
item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot);
The fix here is to use the extent buffer we cloned just a little higher
up to avoid deadlocks caused by using the leaf in the path.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.7+
cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index ecbc63d3143e..9a2ec79e8cfb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -1828,7 +1828,6 @@ static int iterate_inode_extrefs(u64 inum, struct btrfs_root *fs_root,
int found = 0;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
struct btrfs_inode_extref *extref;
- struct extent_buffer *leaf;
u32 item_size;
u32 cur_offset;
unsigned long ptr;
@@ -1856,9 +1855,8 @@ static int iterate_inode_extrefs(u64 inum, struct btrfs_root *fs_root,
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw(eb, BTRFS_READ_LOCK);
btrfs_release_path(path);
- leaf = path->nodes[0];
- item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot);
- ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot);
+ item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, slot);
+ ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, slot);
cur_offset = 0;
while (cur_offset < item_size) {
@@ -1872,7 +1870,7 @@ static int iterate_inode_extrefs(u64 inum, struct btrfs_root *fs_root,
if (ret)
break;
- cur_offset += btrfs_inode_extref_name_len(leaf, extref);
+ cur_offset += btrfs_inode_extref_name_len(eb, extref);
cur_offset += sizeof(*extref);
}
btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(eb);
reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445609756180187@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.