From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.sws.net.au (smtp.sws.net.au [144.76.186.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8467226F2BE for ; Wed, 6 May 2026 03:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=144.76.186.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778039377; cv=none; b=g+RiE1L8v25rZUpPCeWbUUNSuDbmNVLQgqcWwFnholfcW9tLvuM7Qnzlc3Cgq/AJpKmEOXphnseCy7TJgn7tKTGK/SnJcPLcAqBxKiF9h7lcWfCaxeEGK9dDb5B1zTdzy6v2pl/irMBRSNEkr7793tph1uANTqBV0LqJaQt3j+Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778039377; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AZNDDJ/6jTACoqtb23lIgYqWudDg7jZFPMUnc642teA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UNh0w9PPIZHruTBijYa5M7NQLx4/IKzPIzFcTrNZEYDEaXAzmUu9sGHr3NADUYfd8ITgLa2HlemsKYnY907ZynJ3t84vfBbDTHFPyDdbu+AFWfOrFsY/89NbWy5MOX0Wq38Z+W5O/tTWIGPN3wa+5u6eBsyjkefj3SpGHUgGxlc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=coker.com.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=coker.com.au; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=coker.com.au header.i=@coker.com.au header.b=BWC/pht6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=144.76.186.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=coker.com.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=coker.com.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=coker.com.au header.i=@coker.com.au header.b="BWC/pht6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=coker.com.au; s=2008; t=1778039373; bh=QpYpVBVug/nbdTnaJsSRxoa13vVgAOuGdXCeLqZC3wA=; l=639; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BWC/pht6l+5coQVEhJ/yowg9aKIZFbwFmzvcnC4dItYZa+jOAVilNiu9tyHMEDCLt 5ULnIMZ9XtzJOqpF4G50x8Cemc7cn3VzogzNYJ0hOJvzCtKjWwZnDwpI7WAOx4AQSb rlgtYiulQUfPMa4Ihm6NUGsB4PQYojUTOdjXSnSk= Received: from liv.coker.com.au (unknown [IPv6:2001:4479:4401:9500:fd7f:e71:af37:9dfc]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: russell@coker.com.au) by smtp.sws.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7A2310568; Wed, 06 May 2026 13:49:32 +1000 (AEST) From: Russell Coker To: selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org, "Christopher J. PeBenito" Subject: Re: xserver policy Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 13:49:26 +1000 Message-ID: <14459900.RDIVbhacDa@dojacat> In-Reply-To: <49b93cc8-79ea-4f85-b3e8-e24ba8c360ad@ieee.org> References: <3065155.e9J7NaK4W3@xev> <49b93cc8-79ea-4f85-b3e8-e24ba8c360ad@ieee.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Tuesday, 5 May 2026 23:56:57 AEST Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > > Both GNOME and KDE are dropping support for X11. If we don't drop policy > > support for X11 I think we should at least separate xdm and xserver into > > separate modules > > I have no objections to this. There has been some work from the Gentoo > team on a wayland policy too, but I'm unsure what state it is in (it's > upstreamed). Are you saying we should remove the X server policy or just move xdm_t to a different module? I'd prefer to remove X11 support. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/