From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [linux-3.14 test] 63336: regressions - FAIL Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:17:27 +0000 Message-ID: <1446459447.3088.5.camel@citrix.com> References: <56310FF3.6090605@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56310FF3.6090605@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall , osstest service owner , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: Ian Jackson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 18:12 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 28/10/15 17:31, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 63336 linux-3.14 real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63336/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > build-armhf-pvops 5 kernel-build fail REGR. > > vs. 62648 > > > + make -j4 INSTALL_PATH=/home/osstest/build.63336.build-armhf > > -pvops/dist/boot INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/home/osstest/build.63336.build-armhf > > -pvops/dist modules_install dtbs_install > > make: *** No rule to make target `dtbs_install'. Stop. > > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > This is not a Linux regression but a bug introduced in osstest > by d4dba6183d616b1d4f9826834318db48eb8ec5d6 "ts-kernel-build: > Include dtbs in dist file" > > As said by the commit message the target dtbs_install has > been introduced post-3.14. It also says that we only test > 3.16 and onwards on ARM. However this job seems to prove > the contrary. Yes, I had forgotten at the time that we can run on 3.14 in the Cambridge instance, which I rediscovered when writing this osstest patch: commit 54f237784d4b3cbf2f05ed5835798536b5c5d17e Author: Ian Campbell < ian.campbell@citrix.com > Date: Mon Oct 5 16:57:37 2015 +0100 make-flight: Don't bother testing linux-3.10 on ARM. The earliest version which boots on the hardware in the colo is v3.16+ from the current linux-arm-xen branch. However in the h/w in the Cambridge instance works ok with linux-3.14 and linux-3.16. We already skip linux branches 3.4 and earlier, so just add 3.10 too. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell < ian.campbell@citrix.com > Acked-by: Ian Jackson < ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com > > So shall we disable 3.14 job for ARM for once and all? Given the above failure I don't think the ability to test the 3.14 kernels on the Cambridge instance is all that valuable. So yes, I think we should drop ARM from the linux-3.14 flights. We should also force push 3.14 if the above was the only failure.