Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] compat: enforce distinguishable file names in symbol table

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>]

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 08:31 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 03.11.15 at 14:39, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 05:50 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > That's certainly an option on x86 too, the more that the x86_64/
> > > subtree is a remnant of x86_32 days only anyway. Just that doing
> > > this will mean quite a bit more work (not the least because, to be
> > > done properly, I think it implies merging files from x86_64/ into
> > > their
> > > [formerly] shared files where sensible).
> > 
> > FWIW IMHO compiling arch/x86/x86_64/*.c from arch/x86/Makefile now and
> > then
> > tackling the merging as and when it makes sense would be fine.
> 
> Great. It's on my list to do this merge (in steps) anyway. So does
> this mean I can go ahead and commit both this and patch 1, i.e.
> at least kind-of-an-ack?

Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

with the provisos regarding common code and not setting a precedent for ARM
I mentioned before (which doesn't need reflecting in the ack in the commit
message, I'll just remember it)

Ian.