From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 23:05:12 +0000
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] fm10k: don't initialize
 fm10k_workqueue at global level
In-Reply-To: <804857E1F29AAC47BF68C404FC60A1847EC762DE@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1446579302-11494-1-git-send-email-jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
 <804857E1F29AAC47BF68C404FC60A1847EC762DE@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
Message-ID: <1446591912.3990.28.camel@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
List-ID: <intel-wired-lan.osuosl.org>

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 22:40 +0000, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Keller, Jacob E
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 11:35 AM
> > To: Intel Wired LAN
> > Cc: Allan, Bruce W; Keller, Jacob E
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] fm10k: don't initialize fm10k_workqueue at
> > global level
> > 
> > From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
> > 
> > Cleans up checkpatch GLOBAL_INITIALIZERS error
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> > ---
> > -v2
> > * Fix title from checkpatch complaint
> 
> Out of curiosity, what was wrong with the original v1 patch title and
> what was the exact checkpatch complaint?
> 

checkpatch.pl results for patch "[PATCH] fm10k: fix checkpatch
GLOBAL_INITIALISERS error"

WARNING:EMAIL_SUBJECT: A patch subject line should describe the change
not the tool that found it
#4: 
Subject: [PATCH] fm10k: fix checkpatch GLOBAL_INITIALISERS error

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 24 lines checked


Regards,
Jake