From: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] fm10k: don't initialize fm10k_workqueue at global level
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 23:19:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1446592780.3990.33.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <804857E1F29AAC47BF68C404FC60A1847EC76570@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 23:15 +0000, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Keller, Jacob E
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 3:05 PM
> > To: Allan, Bruce W; intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fm10k: don't initialize fm10k_workqueue at
> > global
> > level
> >
> > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 22:40 +0000, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Keller, Jacob E
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 11:35 AM
> > > > To: Intel Wired LAN
> > > > Cc: Allan, Bruce W; Keller, Jacob E
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v2] fm10k: don't initialize fm10k_workqueue at
> > > > global level
> > > >
> > > > From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > Cleans up checkpatch GLOBAL_INITIALIZERS error
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > -v2
> > > > * Fix title from checkpatch complaint
> > >
> > > Out of curiosity, what was wrong with the original v1 patch title
> > > and
> > > what was the exact checkpatch complaint?
> > >
> >
> > checkpatch.pl results for patch "[PATCH] fm10k: fix checkpatch
> > GLOBAL_INITIALISERS error"
> >
> > WARNING:EMAIL_SUBJECT: A patch subject line should describe the
> > change
> > not the tool that found it
> > #4:
> > Subject: [PATCH] fm10k: fix checkpatch GLOBAL_INITIALISERS error
> >
> > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 24 lines checked
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jake
>
> Which version of checkpatch and options did you use? I tried with
> the one in Jeff's tree and others but do not get the same.
The one in Jeff's tree did it for me, and has been since commit
a2fe16b9d878 ("checkpatch: try to avoid poor patch subject lines")
I get:
WARNING: A patch subject line should describe the change not the tool that found it
#4:
Subject: [PATCH] fm10k: fix checkpatch GLOBAL_INITIALISERS error
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 24 lines checked
Your patch has style problems, please review.
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
Regards,
Jake
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-03 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-03 19:35 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] fm10k: don't initialize fm10k_workqueue at global level Jacob Keller
2015-11-03 22:40 ` Allan, Bruce W
2015-11-03 23:05 ` Keller, Jacob E
2015-11-03 23:15 ` Allan, Bruce W
2015-11-03 23:19 ` Keller, Jacob E [this message]
2015-11-03 23:22 ` Allan, Bruce W
2015-11-03 23:31 ` Keller, Jacob E
2015-11-09 23:06 ` Singh, Krishneil K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1446592780.3990.33.camel@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.