From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sjenning@redhat.com, aris@redhat.com, bp@suse.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
mchehab@osg.samsung.com, tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "EDAC, sb_edac: Fix TAD presence check for sbridge_mci_bind_devs()" has been added to the 4.2-stable tree
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 22:58:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1446793126245168@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
EDAC, sb_edac: Fix TAD presence check for sbridge_mci_bind_devs()
to the 4.2-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
edac-sb_edac-fix-tad-presence-check-for-sbridge_mci_bind_devs.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.2 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 2900ea609616c2651dec65312beeb2a6e536bc50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:16:01 -0500
Subject: EDAC, sb_edac: Fix TAD presence check for sbridge_mci_bind_devs()
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
commit 2900ea609616c2651dec65312beeb2a6e536bc50 upstream.
In commit
7d375bffa524 ("sb_edac: Fix support for systems with two home agents per socket")
NUM_CHANNELS was changed to 8 and the channel space was renumerated to
handle EN, EP, and EX configurations.
The *_mci_bind_devs() functions - except for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() -
got a new device presence check in the form of saw_chan_mask. However,
sbridge_mci_bind_devs() still uses the NUM_CHANNELS for loop.
With the increase in NUM_CHANNELS, this loop fails at index 4 since
SB only has 4 TADs. This results in the following error on SB machines:
EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing
EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler
EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handle
This patch adapts the saw_chan_mask logic for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() as
well.
After this patch:
EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#0: DEV 0000:3f:0e.0 (POLLED)
EDAC MC1: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#1: DEV 0000:7f:0e.0 (POLLED)
Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438798561-10180-1-git-send-email-sjenning@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -1648,6 +1648,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct
{
struct sbridge_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info;
struct pci_dev *pdev;
+ u8 saw_chan_mask = 0;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < sbridge_dev->n_devs; i++) {
@@ -1681,6 +1682,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct
{
int id = pdev->device - PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_TAD0;
pvt->pci_tad[id] = pdev;
+ saw_chan_mask |= 1 << id;
}
break;
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_DDRIO:
@@ -1701,10 +1703,8 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct
!pvt-> pci_tad || !pvt->pci_ras || !pvt->pci_ta)
goto enodev;
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHANNELS; i++) {
- if (!pvt->pci_tad[i])
- goto enodev;
- }
+ if (saw_chan_mask != 0x0f)
+ goto enodev;
return 0;
enodev:
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from sjenning@redhat.com are
queue-4.2/edac-sb_edac-fix-tad-presence-check-for-sbridge_mci_bind_devs.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-11-06 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1446793126245168@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=aris@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.