From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:59563 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932616AbbKMQcx (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:32:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1447432370.3271.20.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20151113_173256_547649_C30E77E3) Subject: Re: [RFC v4 6/8] kconfig: introduce "count" From: Johannes Berg To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron , Peter Zijlstra , Michal Marek Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:32:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20151113112630.20c27558@gandalf.local.home> References: <1447318073-22669-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <1447318073-22669-7-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <20151113112630.20c27558@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 11:26 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: >  > >     config MY_DRIVER_2 > >             bool "my driver 2" > >             count MY_COUNTER > > > > This will get MY_COUNTER to have a value of 0, 1 or 2, depending > > on whether or not MY_DRIVER_1/MY_DRIVER_2 are not at all, one or > > both selected respectively. > > I find the name "count" ambiguous. What happened to "increment" or > something? > I forgot about it :) I'll go change it to "increment", that does indeed seem better. johannes