From: mlin@kernel.org (Ming Lin)
Subject: [RFC] generic NVMe target and NVMe loop driver
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:53:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447739639.8017.8.camel@hasee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447662575.23230.105.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
On Mon, 2015-11-16@00:29 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-16@00:08 -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-11-15@23:30 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2015-11-07@18:00 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > This series continues the NVMe host drive split and also starts adding a
> > > > consume for it. The consumer is mostly interesting for developers at this
> > > > point as it's simply a 'loopback' NVMe device that ties the split NVMe
> > > > driver fronted into the new generic NVMe target subsystem.
> > >
> > > Very excited to see this code posted. 8-)
> > >
> > > > This was developed for our NVMe over Fabrics prototype, but will also be useful for
> > > > other work like Ming's virtio-nvme or event an implementation traditional
> > > > PCIe NVMe using vhost.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Wrt to vhost-nvme, the WIP code (Dr. Hannes + Dave CC'ed) I'm currently
> > > hacking on is here:
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git/log/?h=vhost-nvme-wip
> > >
> > > Note it's still a week or two away (using rts-megasas as a reference)
> > > from actually functioning across a modest number of queue resources, but
> > > should at least give interested folks an idea of how things look so far.
> >
> > Hi Nic,
> >
> > FYI,
> >
> > I have done the vhost-nvme patches(based on our previous discussion) on
> > top of NVMe target.
> >
> > I'll post kernel & qemu patches early this week.
> >
>
> Great. Looking forward to seeing the prototype code.
>
> > But the tests I have done so far didn't show competitive performance
> > compared with vhost-scsi. Maybe because the mmio thing is slow.
> >
>
> Anything interesting hot-spots that show up in perf output..?
To ease development, I use nested kvm.
"vm_host" runs on bare metal and "vm_guest" runs on "vm_host"
I just integrated Google's extension to vhost-nvme.
https://github.com/rlnelson-git/linux-nvme.git
It's amazing performance improves a lot.
I use a 256M /dev/ram0 on vm_host as backend.
fio 4k read:
qemu-nvme: ~20M to ~30M
qemu-vhost-nvme + google ext: 80M to 200M(not very stable though)
(BTW, still waiting for employer's approval to send out patches)
PerfTop: 1039 irqs/sec kernel:99.8% exact: 0.0% [4000Hz cpu-clock], (all, 4 CPUs)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
36.93% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irq
20.98% [kernel] [k] vmx_handle_external_intr
10.10% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
4.95% [kernel] [k] __mutex_unlock_slowpath
4.41% [kernel] [k] lock_acquire
4.15% [kernel] [k] lock_is_held
2.30% [kernel] [k] mutex_lock_nested
1.68% [kernel] [k] lock_release
1.14% [kernel] [k] put_compound_page
0.93% [kernel] [k] debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled
0.66% [kernel] [k] check_preemption_disabled
0.64% [kernel] [k] __schedule
0.62% [kernel] [k] lock_acquired
0.54% [kernel] [k] rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online
0.54% [kernel] [k] preempt_count_sub
0.54% [kernel] [k] preempt_count_add
0.46% [kernel] [k] find_vma
0.45% [kernel] [k] vmcs_writel
0.40% [kernel] [k] ___might_sleep
0.38% [kernel] [k] rcu_note_context_switch
0.37% [kernel] [k] rcu_read_lock_sched_held
0.32% [kernel] [k] __rcu_is_watching
0.32% [kernel] [k] follow_trans_huge_pmd
0.31% [kernel] [k] debug_smp_processor_id
0.22% [kernel] [k] follow_page_mask
0.18% [kernel] [k] __get_user_pages
0.16% [kernel] [k] vmx_read_guest_seg_ar
0.16% [kernel] [k] nvmet_vhost_rw
0.15% [kernel] [k] kthread_should_stop
0.14% [kernel] [k] schedule
0.14% [kernel] [k] rcu_is_watching
0.12% [kernel] [k] nvmet_vhost_sq_thread
0.11% [kernel] [k] get_parent_ip
0.11% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-17 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-07 17:00 [RFC] generic NVMe target and NVMe loop driver Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/8] nvme: move set_queue_count to common code Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/8] nvme: move enable/disable/shutdown_ctrl " Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-08 16:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-09 10:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 3/8] nvme: move CC setup into nvme_enable_ctrl Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] nvme: move the timeout module paramters to common code Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] nvme: add segment limitations Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] nvme: export symbols needed for nvme-loop Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] nvmet: add a generic NVMe target Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-08 10:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-08 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] nvme-loop: add a NVMe loopback device Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-08 10:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-08 13:22 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-08 13:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-15 19:18 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-16 8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-16 9:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-16 7:30 ` [RFC] generic NVMe target and NVMe loop driver Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-11-16 8:08 ` Ming Lin
2015-11-16 8:29 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-11-17 5:53 ` Ming Lin [this message]
2015-11-16 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447739639.8017.8.camel@hasee \
--to=mlin@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.