From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix handling of the disable_power_well module option
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:36:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447788977.9159.19.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151117124604.GA2956@patrik-desktop.isw.intel.com>
On ti, 2015-11-17 at 13:46 +0100, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:03:54PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > When this option is 0 (so the power well support is disabled) we are
> > supposed to enable all power wells once and don't disable them unless we
> > system suspend the device. Currently if the option is 0, we can call the
> > power well enable handlers multiple times, whenever their refcount
> > changes from 0->1. This may not be a problem for the HW, but it's not
> > logical and may trigger some warnings in the power well code which
> > doesn't expect this. So simply keep around a reference while we are
> > not system suspended to solve this. For simplicity mark the module
> > option read only, so we don't need to deal with re-enabling the feature
> > during runtime. If someone really needs that it could be added later in
> > a more proper way.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > index 7cf7474..2b36e67 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ module_param_named_unsafe(preliminary_hw_support, i915.preliminary_hw_support, i
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(preliminary_hw_support,
> > "Enable preliminary hardware support.");
> >
> > -module_param_named_unsafe(disable_power_well, i915.disable_power_well, int, 0600);
> > +module_param_named_unsafe(disable_power_well, i915.disable_power_well, int, 0400);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_power_well,
> > "Disable display power wells when possible "
> > "(-1=auto [default], 0=power wells always on, 1=power wells disabled when possible)");
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index b33969b..d167a45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > for_each_power_well_rev(i, power_well, BIT(domain), power_domains) {
> > WARN_ON(!power_well->count);
> >
> > - if (!--power_well->count && i915.disable_power_well)
> > + if (!--power_well->count)
> > intel_power_well_disable(dev_priv, power_well);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1899,6 +1899,10 @@ void intel_power_domains_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > * the power well is not enabled, so just enable it in case
> > * we're going to unload/reload. */
> > intel_display_set_init_power(dev_priv, true);
> > +
> > + /* Remove the refcount we took to keep power well support disabled. */
> > + if (!i915.disable_power_well)
> > + intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
> > }
> >
> > static void intel_power_domains_sync_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > @@ -2099,6 +2103,9 @@ void intel_power_domains_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool resume)
> >
> > /* For now, we need the power well to be always enabled. */
> > intel_display_set_init_power(dev_priv, true);
> > + /* Disable power support if the user asked so. */
> > + if (!i915.disable_power_well)
> > + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
> > intel_power_domains_sync_hw(dev_priv);
> > power_domains->initializing = false;
> > }
> > @@ -2114,6 +2121,13 @@ void intel_power_domains_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > {
> > if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv))
> > skl_display_core_uninit(dev_priv);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Even if power well support was disabled we still want to disabled
> > + * we want to disable the power wells while we are system suspended.
> > + */
>
> This comment needs fixing. With that done:
>
> Reviewed-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Pushed to dinq, thanks for the review.
>
> > + if (!i915.disable_power_well)
> > + intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
> > }
> >
> > /**
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-17 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-11 17:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: fix handling of the disable_power_well module option Imre Deak
2015-11-17 12:46 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2015-11-17 19:36 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2015-11-17 15:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447788977.9159.19.camel@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.