From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Current LibXL Status
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:20:58 +0000
Message-ID: <1447924858.5647.15.camel@citrix.com>
References: <564CC43B.1000904@ainfosec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <564CC43B.1000904@ainfosec.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Martin Osterloh <osterlohm@ainfosec.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 18:32 +0000, Martin Osterloh wrote:

> I wanted to inquire about the current state of LibXL and in particular 
> if there are any issues with using it in long-running processes.

It is currently being used by libvirtd which I think has shaken out most of
the issues with that environment.

There are certain to be other bugs, but nothing show-stopping.

Ian.