All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: marius.c.vlad@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rpm tests for set_caching and set_tiling ioctl(s)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:08:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448482101.32235.136.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448471779-24328-2-git-send-email-marius.c.vlad@intel.com>

On ke, 2015-11-25 at 19:16 +0200, marius.c.vlad@intel.com wrote:
> From: Marius Vlad <marius.c.vlad@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.c.vlad@intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/pm_rpm.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 120 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/pm_rpm.c b/tests/pm_rpm.c
> index c4fb19c..157cf29 100644
> --- a/tests/pm_rpm.c
> +++ b/tests/pm_rpm.c
> @@ -1729,6 +1729,120 @@ static void planes_subtest(bool universal, bool dpms)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void pm_test_tiling(void)
> +{
> +	uint32_t *handles;
> +	uint8_t **gem_bufs;
> +
> +	int max_gem_objs = 0;
> +	uint8_t off_bit = 20;
> +	uint32_t gtt_obj_max_size = (16 * 1024 * 1024);
> +
> +	uint32_t i, j, tiling_modes[3] = {
> +		I915_TILING_NONE,
> +		I915_TILING_X,
> +		I915_TILING_Y,
> +	};
> +	uint32_t ti, sw;
> +
> +	/* default value */
> +	uint32_t stride = 1024;
> +
> +	/* calculate how many objects we can map */
> +	for (j = 1 << off_bit; j <= gtt_obj_max_size; j <<= 1, max_gem_objs++)
> +		;

With these sizes we may end up with all objects properly aligned,
that's why I suggested smaller objects. Based on I830_FENCE_START_MASK
we could allocate for example starting from 16kB to 256kB.

> +
> +	gem_bufs = calloc(max_gem_objs, sizeof(uint8_t *));
> +	handles = malloc(sizeof(uint32_t) * max_gem_objs);

Nitpick: sizeof(*ptr) is safer and you could've used calloc in both
cases.

> +
> +	/* map to gtt and store some random data */
> +	for (i = 0, j = 1 << off_bit; j <= gtt_obj_max_size; j <<= 1, i++) {
> +		handles[i] = gem_create(drm_fd, j);
> +		gem_bufs[i] = gem_mmap__gtt(drm_fd, handles[i], j, PROT_WRITE);
> +		memset(gem_bufs[i], 0x65, j);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* try to set different tiling for each handle */
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tiling_modes); i++) {
> +		disable_all_screens_and_wait(&ms_data);
> +
> +		for (j = 0; j < max_gem_objs; j++) {
> +			gem_set_tiling(drm_fd, handles[j], tiling_modes[i], stride);
> +
> +			gem_get_tiling(drm_fd, handles[j], &ti, &sw);
> +			igt_assert(tiling_modes[i] == ti);
> +		}
> +
> +		enable_one_screen_and_wait(&ms_data);

Ok, but after the second iteration all objects could be properly
aligned, so it's better to close/realloc/memset the objects in each
iteration.

> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0, j = 1 << off_bit; j <= gtt_obj_max_size; j <<= 1, i++) {
> +		igt_assert(munmap(gem_bufs[i], j) == 0);
> +		gem_close(drm_fd, handles[i]);
> +	}
> +
> +	free(gem_bufs);
> +	free(handles);
> +}
> +
> +static void pm_test_caching(void)
> +{
> +	uint32_t *handles;
> +	uint8_t **gem_bufs;
> +	int8_t has_caching_display = -1;
> +
> +	uint32_t i, j, got_caching;
> +	uint32_t gtt_obj_max_size = (16 * 1024 * 1024);
> +	uint32_t cache_levels[3] = {
> +		I915_CACHING_NONE,
> +		I915_CACHING_CACHED,		/* LLC caching */
> +		I915_CACHING_DISPLAY,		/* eDRAM caching */
> +	};
> +
> +	int max_gem_objs = 0;
> +	uint8_t off_bit = 20;
> +
> +	for (j = 1 << off_bit; j <= gtt_obj_max_size; j <<= 1, max_gem_objs++)
> +		;

No need to bother about alignment here, so we can just use a single
16kB object for example.

> +
> +	gem_bufs = calloc(max_gem_objs, sizeof(uint8_t *));
> +	handles = malloc(sizeof(uint32_t) * max_gem_objs);
> +
> +	for (i = 0, j = 1 << off_bit; j <= gtt_obj_max_size; j <<= 1, i++) {
> +		handles[i] = gem_create(drm_fd, j);
> +		gem_bufs[i] = gem_mmap__gtt(drm_fd, handles[i], j, PROT_WRITE);
> +		memset(gem_bufs[i], 0x65, j);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* figure out if we have cache display available on the platform */
> +	gem_set_caching(drm_fd, handles[0], I915_CACHING_DISPLAY);
> +	if (gem_get_caching(drm_fd, handles[0]))

No need to hardcode I915_CACHING_NONE here. Also I liked the original
version to check this everywhere better, by accepting both
CACHING_DISPLAY and CACHING_NONE as a result.

> +		has_caching_display++;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cache_levels) + has_caching_display; i++) {
> +		disable_all_screens_and_wait(&ms_data);
> +
> +		for (j = 0; j < max_gem_objs; j++) {
> +			gem_set_caching(drm_fd, handles[j], cache_levels[i]);
> +
> +			igt_debug("Verying cache for handle %u, level %u\n", j, i);
> +			got_caching = gem_get_caching(drm_fd, handles[j]);
> +
> +			igt_assert(got_caching == cache_levels[i]);
> +		}
> +
> +		enable_one_screen_and_wait(&ms_data);

The object can be unbound after the IOCTL so you need to do a memset at
the begin of each iteration.

> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0, j = 1 << off_bit; j <= gtt_obj_max_size; j <<= 1, i++) {
> +		igt_assert(munmap(gem_bufs[i], j) == 0);
> +		gem_close(drm_fd, handles[i]);
> +	}
> +
> +	free(handles);
> +	free(gem_bufs);
> +}
> +
>  static void fences_subtest(bool dpms)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -1927,6 +2041,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  	igt_subtest("gem-execbuf-stress-extra-wait")
>  		gem_execbuf_stress_subtest(rounds, WAIT_STATUS | WAIT_EXTRA);
>  
> +	/* power-wake reference tests */
> +	igt_subtest("pm-tiling")
> +		pm_test_tiling();
> +	igt_subtest("pm-caching")
> +		pm_test_caching();
> +
>  	igt_fixture
>  		teardown_environment();
>  
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-25 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-24 17:42 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rpm tests for set_caching and set_tiling ioctl(s) marius.c.vlad
2015-11-24 22:57 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-25 17:16   ` [PATCH i-g-t v2] " marius.c.vlad
2015-11-25 17:16     ` [PATCH i-g-t] " marius.c.vlad
2015-11-25 20:08       ` Imre Deak [this message]
2015-11-26 10:55         ` Marius Vlad
2015-11-26 11:57           ` Imre Deak
2015-11-26 16:32 ` Marius Vlad
2015-11-26 18:23   ` Imre Deak
2015-11-27 18:08 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4] tests/pm_rpm tests for set_caching and set_tiling Marius Vlad
2015-11-27 18:08   ` [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rpm tests for set_caching and set_tiling ioctl(s) Marius Vlad
2015-11-27 19:51     ` Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1448482101.32235.136.camel@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=marius.c.vlad@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.