From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use a crtc mask instead of a active refcount for dpll functions.
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:36:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448548587.3189.38.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448358258-30209-1-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 10:44 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This makes it easier to verify correct dpll setup with only a single crtc.
> It it also useful to detect double dpll enable/disable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> -
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index b86feeeafc45..37d4a7f3d112 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -3236,7 +3236,7 @@ static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m,
> void *unused)
>
> seq_printf(m, "DPLL%i: %s, id: %i\n", i, pll->name, pll->id);
> seq_printf(m, " crtc_mask: 0x%08x, active: %d, on: %s\n",
> - pll->config.crtc_mask, pll->active, yesno(pll
> ->on));
> + pll->config.crtc_mask, hweight32(pll
> ->active_mask), yesno(pll->on));
> seq_printf(m, " tracked hardware state:\n");
> seq_printf(m, " dpll: 0x%08x\n", pll
> ->config.hw_state.dpll);
> seq_printf(m, " dpll_md: 0x%08x\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index f3ad72abeea7..e0763c3005e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ struct intel_shared_dpll_config {
> struct intel_shared_dpll {
> struct intel_shared_dpll_config config;
>
> - int active; /* count of number of active CRTCs (i.e. DPMS on) */
> + unsigned active_mask; /* mask of active CRTCs (i.e. DPMS on) */
> bool on; /* is the PLL actually active? Disabled during modeset */
> const char *name;
> /* should match the index in the dev_priv->shared_dplls array */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 3317db3806a8..79bb22ef67dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ static void intel_prepare_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc
> *crtc)
> return;
>
> WARN_ON(!pll->config.crtc_mask);
> - if (pll->active == 0) {
> + if (pll->active_mask == 0) {
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("setting up %s\n", pll->name);
> WARN_ON(pll->on);
> assert_shared_dpll_disabled(dev_priv, pll);
> @@ -1892,6 +1892,7 @@ static void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc
> *crtc)
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = intel_crtc_to_shared_dpll(crtc);
> + unsigned crtc_mask = 1 << drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base);
>
> if (WARN_ON(pll == NULL))
> return;
> @@ -1899,11 +1900,16 @@ static void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc
> *crtc)
> if (WARN_ON(pll->config.crtc_mask == 0))
> return;
>
> + if (WARN_ON(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask))
> + return;
> +
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("enable %s (active %d, on? %d) for crtc %d\n",
> - pll->name, pll->active, pll->on,
> + pll->name, hweight32(pll->active_mask), pll->on,
Maybe just print active_mask, it is more informative anyway.
> crtc->base.base.id);
>
> - if (pll->active++) {
> + pll->active_mask |= crtc_mask;
> +
> + if (pll->active_mask != crtc_mask) {
> WARN_ON(!pll->on);
> assert_shared_dpll_enabled(dev_priv, pll);
> return;
> @@ -1922,30 +1928,33 @@ static void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct
> intel_crtc *crtc)
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = intel_crtc_to_shared_dpll(crtc);
> + unsigned crtc_mask = 1 << drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base);
>
> /* PCH only available on ILK+ */
> - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 5)
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen < 5)
> return;
>
> if (pll == NULL)
> return;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(!(pll->config.crtc_mask & (1 << drm_crtc_index(&crtc
> ->base)))))
> + if (WARN_ON(!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask)))
> return;
>
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable %s (active %d, on? %d) for crtc %d\n",
> - pll->name, pll->active, pll->on,
> + if (WARN_ON(!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask)))
> + return;
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n",
> + pll->name, pll->active_mask, pll->on,
> crtc->base.base.id);
>
> - if (WARN_ON(pll->active == 0)) {
> + pll->active_mask &= ~crtc_mask;
> + if (pll->active_mask) {
> assert_shared_dpll_disabled(dev_priv, pll);
> return;
> }
That call to assert_shared_dpll_disabled() looks wrong now. Just remove it, move
the assert enable after the DRM_DEBUG_KMS and add
Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
Ander
>
> assert_shared_dpll_enabled(dev_priv, pll);
> WARN_ON(!pll->on);
> - if (--pll->active)
> - return;
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disabling %s\n", pll->name);
> pll->disable(dev_priv, pll);
> @@ -4239,10 +4248,10 @@ struct intel_shared_dpll *intel_get_shared_dpll(struct
> intel_crtc *crtc,
> if (memcmp(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state,
> &shared_dpll[i].hw_state,
> sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state)) == 0) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("CRTC:%d sharing existing %s (crtc mask
> 0x%08x, ative %d)\n",
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("CRTC:%d sharing existing %s (crtc mask
> 0x%08x, active 0x%08x)\n",
> crtc->base.base.id, pll->name,
> shared_dpll[i].crtc_mask,
> - pll->active);
> + pll->active_mask);
> goto found;
> }
> }
> @@ -12841,12 +12850,12 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> active = pll->get_hw_state(dev_priv, pll, &dpll_hw_state);
>
> - I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active > hweight32(pll
> ->config.crtc_mask),
> - "more active pll users than references: %i vs %i\n",
> - pll->active, hweight32(pll->config.crtc_mask));
> - I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active && !pll->on,
> + I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask & ~pll->config.crtc_mask,
> + "more active pll users than references: %x vs %x\n",
> + pll->active_mask, pll->config.crtc_mask);
> + I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask && !pll->on,
> "pll in active use but not on in sw tracking\n");
> - I915_STATE_WARN(pll->on && !pll->active,
> + I915_STATE_WARN(pll->on && !pll->active_mask,
> "pll in on but not on in use in sw tracking\n");
> I915_STATE_WARN(pll->on != active,
> "pll on state mismatch (expected %i, found %i)\n",
> @@ -12854,16 +12863,16 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
> if (crtc->base.state->enable &&
> intel_crtc_to_shared_dpll(crtc) == pll)
> - enabled_crtcs++;
> + enabled_crtcs |= 1 << drm_crtc_index(&crtc
> ->base);
> if (crtc->active && intel_crtc_to_shared_dpll(crtc)
> == pll)
> - active_crtcs++;
> + active_crtcs |= 1 << drm_crtc_index(&crtc
> ->base);
> }
> - I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active != active_crtcs,
> - "pll active crtcs mismatch (expected %i, found %i)\n",
> - pll->active, active_crtcs);
> - I915_STATE_WARN(hweight32(pll->config.crtc_mask) !=
> enabled_crtcs,
> - "pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected %i, found %i)\n",
> - hweight32(pll->config.crtc_mask), enabled_crtcs);
> + I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask != active_crtcs,
> + "pll active crtcs mismatch (expected %x, found %x)\n",
> + pll->active_mask, active_crtcs);
> + I915_STATE_WARN(pll->config.crtc_mask != enabled_crtcs,
> + "pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected %x, found %x)\n",
> + pll->config.crtc_mask, enabled_crtcs);
>
> I915_STATE_WARN(pll->on && memcmp(&pll->config.hw_state,
> &dpll_hw_state,
> sizeof(dpll_hw_state)),
> @@ -15502,14 +15511,13 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct
> drm_device *dev)
>
> pll->on = pll->get_hw_state(dev_priv, pll,
> &pll->config.hw_state);
> - pll->active = 0;
> + pll->active_mask = 0;
> pll->config.crtc_mask = 0;
> for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
> - if (crtc->active && intel_crtc_to_shared_dpll(crtc)
> == pll) {
> - pll->active++;
> + if (crtc->active && intel_crtc_to_shared_dpll(crtc)
> == pll)
> pll->config.crtc_mask |= 1 << crtc->pipe;
> - }
> }
> + pll->active_mask = pll->config.crtc_mask;
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s hw state readout: crtc_mask 0x%08x, on
> %i\n",
> pll->name, pll->config.crtc_mask, pll->on);
> @@ -15615,7 +15623,7 @@ intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->num_shared_dpll; i++) {
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i];
>
> - if (!pll->on || pll->active)
> + if (!pll->on || pll->active_mask)
> continue;
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s enabled but not in use, disabling\n", pll
> ->name);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-24 9:44 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use a crtc mask instead of a active refcount for dpll functions Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-24 9:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Perform dpll commit first Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-26 14:41 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-30 9:08 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-26 14:36 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448548587.3189.38.camel@gmail.com \
--to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.