From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: fsck: Fix a false alert where extent record has wrong metadata flag
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:20:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448551221.8809.7.camel@scientia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151126142733.GR31035@twin.jikos.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 880 bytes --]
Hey.
I can confirm that the new patch fixes the issue on both test
filesystems.
Thanks for working that out. I guess there's no longer a need to keep
that old filesystems now?!
Cheers,
Chris.
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:27 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 02:19:06PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > In process_extent_item(), it gives 'metadata' initial value 0, but
> > for
> > non-skinny-metadata case, metadata extent can't be judged just from
> > key
> > type and it forgot that case.
> >
> > This causes a lot of false alert in non-skinny-metadata filesystem.
> >
> > Fix it by set correct metadata value before calling
> > add_extent_rec().
> >
> > Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Patch replaced, thanks. The test image is pushed as well.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5313 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 6:19 [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: fsck: Fix a false alert where extent record has wrong metadata flag Qu Wenruo
2015-11-26 14:27 ` David Sterba
2015-11-26 15:20 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer [this message]
2015-11-27 0:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-11-27 0:54 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448551221.8809.7.camel@scientia.net \
--to=calestyo@scientia.net \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.